head to head · open source

Bruno vs api-platform

Bruno has 47,022 GitHub stars, 2,888 forks, 1,831 open issues and last shipped yesterday. api-platform has 9,185 stars, 971 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. Bruno leads on adoption by 412% (47,022 vs 9,185 stars). Bruno is written in JavaScript under MIT; api-platform is written in PHP under MIT. Bruno has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, api-platform 11%. Bruno was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Bruno ★ 47K api-platform ★ 9.2K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Bruno api-platform
GitHub stars ★ 47K ★ 9.2K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript PHP
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-01
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 971
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Bruno if

  • You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Bruno profile →

pick api-platform if

  • You want the api-platform feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and api-platform fits your workflow better

full api-platform profile →

About Bruno

Bruno is a lightweight, open source API client and IDE for exploring and testing APIs, built for developers and teams who want their request collections stored as plain text in a folder on their own filesystem rather than in a vendor's cloud.

read the full Bruno overview →

About api-platform

API Platform is an MIT licensed, PHP based next generation web framework for building API first projects, aimed at backend and full stack teams that want to expose hypermedia REST and GraphQL APIs from plain PHP data models without leaving the Symfony and JavaScript ecosystems they already know.

read the full api-platform overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs bruno hoppscotch vs bruno fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

Bruno vs fastapi Bruno vs Hoppscotch Bruno vs Insomnia Bruno vs one-api Bruno vs OpenAPI-Specification Bruno vs openapi-generator Bruno vs redoc Bruno vs SafeLine Bruno vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF Bruno vs grpc-gateway Bruno vs Yaak Bruno vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is Bruno or api-platform more popular?

Bruno has 47,022 GitHub stars and api-platform has 9,185. Bruno has the larger community by that measure.

Are Bruno and api-platform free?

Both are open source. Bruno is licensed under MIT and api-platform under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Bruno and api-platform?

Bruno is written in JavaScript and api-platform in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Bruno or api-platform?

Choose Bruno if you want the larger community (47,022 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose api-platform if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.