head to head · open source

autoprompt-skill vs flow-next

autoprompt-skill has 1,170 GitHub stars, 72 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped yesterday. flow-next has 698 stars, 55 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped yesterday. autoprompt-skill leads on adoption by 68% (1,170 vs 698 stars). autoprompt-skill is written in JavaScript under MIT; flow-next is written in Python under MIT. autoprompt-skill has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, flow-next 8%. flow-next was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (claude-code, cli, code-review, codex), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

autoprompt-skill ★ 1.2K flow-next ★ 698 category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

autoprompt-skill flow-next
GitHub stars ★ 1.2K ★ 698
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript Python
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 72 ⑂ 55
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick autoprompt-skill if

  • You weight community size — 1.2K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full autoprompt-skill profile →

pick flow-next if

  • You want the flow-next feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and flow-next fits your workflow better

full flow-next profile →

About autoprompt-skill

Autoprompt is an MIT licensed coding agent skill for developers and teams working in agentic coding environments who want fewer failed runs, adding a review, fix, and recheck workflow to supported coding agents such as Claude Code, Codex, and OpenCode.

read the full autoprompt-skill overview →

About flow-next

Flow Next is a workflow plugin that runs inside AI coding agents such as Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and Droid, turning a change request into specs, implementation, adversarial cross model review, and a pull request with recorded evidence, and it is aimed at individual developers and teams who already generate code with agents but lack a repeatable way to verify the result.

read the full flow-next overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

gitea vs gogs codegraph vs code-review-graph gitea vs open-code-review gitea vs code-review-graph gitea vs reflex gogs vs open-code-review gitea vs gitlab gitea vs gitbutler openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More Version Control & Collaboration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.

autoprompt-skill vs Gitea autoprompt-skill vs Gogs autoprompt-skill vs open-code-review autoprompt-skill vs code-review-graph autoprompt-skill vs Reflex autoprompt-skill vs GitLab autoprompt-skill vs GitButler autoprompt-skill vs Coder autoprompt-skill vs gitpod autoprompt-skill vs pr-agent autoprompt-skill vs Encore autoprompt-skill vs reviewdog

Frequently asked questions

Is autoprompt-skill or flow-next more popular?

autoprompt-skill has 1,170 GitHub stars and flow-next has 698. autoprompt-skill has the larger community by that measure.

Are autoprompt-skill and flow-next free?

Both are open source. autoprompt-skill is licensed under MIT and flow-next under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between autoprompt-skill and flow-next?

autoprompt-skill is written in JavaScript and flow-next in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, autoprompt-skill or flow-next?

Choose autoprompt-skill if you want the larger community (1,170 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose flow-next if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.