head to head · open source
Archon vs donutbrowser
Archon has 23,823 GitHub stars, 3,520 forks, 321 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. donutbrowser has 4,213 stars, 439 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Archon leads on adoption by 465% (23,823 vs 4,213 stars). Archon is written in TypeScript under MIT; donutbrowser is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. Archon has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, donutbrowser 10%. donutbrowser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Archon | donutbrowser | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 24K | ★ 4.2K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.5K | ⑂ 439 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Archon if
- You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick donutbrowser if
- You want the donutbrowser feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and donutbrowser fits your workflow better
About Archon
Archon The first open source harness builder for AI coding. Make AI coding deterministic and repeatable. Archon is a workflow engine for AI coding agents. Define your development processes as YAML workflows planning, implementation, validation, code review, PR creation and run them reliably across all your projects. Like what Dockerfiles did for infrastructure and GitHub Actions did for CI/CD Archon does for AI coding workflows. Think n8n, but for software development. Why Archon? When you ask an AI agent to "fix this bug", what happens depends on the model's mood. It might skip planning. It might forget to run…
read the full Archon overview →
About donutbrowser
Donut Browser Open Source Anti Detect Browser donutbrowser.com Features Unlimited browser profiles: each fully isolated with its own fingerprint, cookies, extensions, and data Anti detect Chromium engine: powered by Wayfern, a privacy focused Chromium fork whose fingerprint spoofing is not detected by Cloudflare, reCaptcha v3, or other browser fingerprinting and anti bot services DNS AdBlocker: block ads, trackers, and other unwanted content with per profile DNS blocking Proxy support: HTTP, HTTPS, SOCKS4, SOCKS5 per profile, with dynamic proxy URLs VPN support: WireGuard configs per profile Local API & MCP…
read the full donutbrowser overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Archon or donutbrowser more popular?
Archon has 23,823 GitHub stars and donutbrowser has 4,213. Archon has the larger community by that measure.
Are Archon and donutbrowser free?
Both are open source. Archon is licensed under MIT and donutbrowser under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Archon and donutbrowser?
Archon is written in TypeScript and donutbrowser in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Archon or donutbrowser?
Choose Archon if you want the larger community (23,823 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose donutbrowser if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.