head to head · open source

Archon vs donutbrowser

Archon has 23,505 GitHub stars, 3,474 forks, 321 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. donutbrowser has 3,861 stars, 410 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Archon leads on adoption by 509% (23,505 vs 3,861 stars). Archon is written in TypeScript under MIT; donutbrowser is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. Archon has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, donutbrowser 11%. donutbrowser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Archon ★ 24K donutbrowser ★ 3.9K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Archon donutbrowser
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 3.9K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 3.5K ⑂ 410
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Archon if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Archon profile →

pick donutbrowser if

  • You want the donutbrowser feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and donutbrowser fits your workflow better

full donutbrowser profile →

About Archon

Archon is an open source workflow engine for AI coding agents, written in TypeScript and released under the MIT license. It lives in the AI coding ecosystem, alongside tools such as Claude Code, and is distributed through the Bun runtime and the GitHub CLI. The project describes itself as a harness builder: it lets a developer encode a development process as a YAML workflow and then run that workflow reliably across projects. Workflows are stored in a .archon/workflows/ directory and committed to the repository, so the same definition can be invoked from the CLI, a web UI, Slack, Telegram, or GitHub.…

read the full Archon overview →

About donutbrowser

Donut Browser is a free, open source anti detect browser written in Rust for anyone who needs many fully isolated browser identities — each with its own fingerprint, cookies, extensions, proxy, and VPN — running from one desktop install, and for the automation engineers and teams who script or sync those profiles.

read the full donutbrowser overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

Archon vs ansible Archon vs compose Archon vs conductor Archon vs xxl-job Archon vs gitleaks Archon vs Kestra Archon vs haystack Archon vs rancher Archon vs Prefect Archon vs Temporal Archon vs rowboat Archon vs Trigger

Frequently asked questions

Is Archon or donutbrowser more popular?

Archon has 23,505 GitHub stars and donutbrowser has 3,861. Archon has the larger community by that measure.

Are Archon and donutbrowser free?

Both are open source. Archon is licensed under MIT and donutbrowser under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Archon and donutbrowser?

Archon is written in TypeScript and donutbrowser in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Archon or donutbrowser?

Choose Archon if you want the larger community (23,505 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose donutbrowser if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.