head to head · open source

AppSmith vs web-maker

AppSmith has 40,922 GitHub stars, 4,764 forks, 4,467 open issues and last shipped yesterday. web-maker has 2,698 stars, 324 forks, 120 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. AppSmith leads on adoption by 1,417% (40,922 vs 2,698 stars). AppSmith is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; web-maker is written in JavaScript under MIT. AppSmith has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, web-maker 12%. AppSmith was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AppSmith ★ 41K web-maker ★ 2.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

AppSmith web-maker
GitHub stars ★ 41K ★ 2.7K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-21 2026-08-03
Forks ⑂ 4.8K ⑂ 324
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AppSmith if

  • You weight community size — 41K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AppSmith profile →

pick web-maker if

  • You want the web-maker feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and web-maker fits your workflow better

full web-maker profile →

About AppSmith

Appsmith is an open source, Apache 2.0 low code platform written primarily in TypeScript that lets teams build custom internal tools such as admin panels, dashboards, and CRUD applications on top of their own databases and APIs.

read the full AppSmith overview →

About web-maker

Web Maker is an MIT licensed, offline frontend code editor and playground for HTML, CSS and JavaScript experiments that runs entirely on the user's own system, and it is aimed at frontend developers who want CodePen style quick prototyping without a network connection.

read the full web-maker overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 265K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

AppSmith vs ECC AppSmith vs react AppSmith vs Langflow AppSmith vs Supabase AppSmith vs puppeteer AppSmith vs archify AppSmith vs PocketBase AppSmith vs i-have-adhd AppSmith vs codebase-memory-mcp AppSmith vs ToolJet AppSmith vs it-tools AppSmith vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is AppSmith or web-maker more popular?

AppSmith has 40,922 GitHub stars and web-maker has 2,698. AppSmith has the larger community by that measure.

Are AppSmith and web-maker free?

Both are open source. AppSmith is licensed under Apache-2.0 and web-maker under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AppSmith and web-maker?

AppSmith is written in TypeScript and web-maker in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AppSmith or web-maker?

Choose AppSmith if you want the larger community (40,922 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose web-maker if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.