head to head · open source

Apache SkyWalking vs gloc

Apache SkyWalking has 24,988 GitHub stars, 6,632 forks, 41 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. gloc has 653 stars, 46 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 1.0 years ago. Apache SkyWalking leads on adoption by 3,727% (24,988 vs 653 stars). Apache SkyWalking is written in Java under Apache-2.0; gloc is written in TypeScript under GPL-2.0. Apache SkyWalking has attracted 27% as many forks as stars, gloc 7%. Apache SkyWalking was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (metrics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Apache SkyWalking ★ 25K gloc ★ 653 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Apache SkyWalking gloc
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 653
License Apache-2.0 GPL-2.0
Written in Java TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-03 2025-11-02
Forks ⑂ 6.6K ⑂ 46
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Apache SkyWalking if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Apache SkyWalking profile →

pick gloc if

  • You want the gloc feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and gloc fits your workflow better

full gloc profile →

About Apache SkyWalking

Apache SkyWalking ========== SkyWalking : an APM (Application Performance Monitoring) system, especially designed for microservices, cloud native and container based architectures. Abstract SkyWalking is an open source APM system that provides monitoring, tracing and diagnosing capabilities for distributed systems in Cloud Native architectures. Distributed Tracing End to end distributed tracing. Service topology analysis, service centric observability and APIs dashboards. Agents for your stack Java, .Net Core, PHP, NodeJS, Golang, LUA, Rust, C++, Client JavaScript and Python agents with active development and…

read the full Apache SkyWalking overview →

About gloc

Browser extension GLOC ( Chrome, Opera, Firefox, Edge ) DISCLAIMER Github does not have a function to view the total number of lines of code in the project but we can to compute an approximation of that data (LOC: Lines of Code) through the GitHub Statistics API. Some glitches may occur, such as negative loc or unavailable data for many reasons History and origins Gloc means 'Github lines of code counter' Initial version: 2.0.1 ( 2017, 12 february ) I made this extension in the Russian Army while was on duty. My fastest open source ever ) Description Works for public and private repos Counts lines of code in…

read the full gloc overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Apache SkyWalking or gloc more popular?

Apache SkyWalking has 24,988 GitHub stars and gloc has 653. Apache SkyWalking has the larger community by that measure.

Are Apache SkyWalking and gloc free?

Both are open source. Apache SkyWalking is licensed under Apache-2.0 and gloc under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Apache SkyWalking and gloc?

Apache SkyWalking is written in Java and gloc in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Apache SkyWalking or gloc?

Choose Apache SkyWalking if you want the larger community (24,988 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose gloc if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.