head to head · open source

ansible vs ftpgrab

ansible has 70,721 GitHub stars, 24,333 forks, 837 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ftpgrab has 562 stars, 77 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped 26 days ago. ansible leads on adoption by 12,484% (70,721 vs 562 stars). ansible is written in Python under GPL-3.0; ftpgrab is written in Go under MIT. ansible has attracted 34% as many forks as stars, ftpgrab 14%. ansible was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ansible ★ 71K ftpgrab ★ 562 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

ansible ftpgrab
GitHub stars ★ 71K ★ 562
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-08-24
Forks ⑂ 24K ⑂ 77
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ansible if

  • You weight community size — 71K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ansible profile →

pick ftpgrab if

  • You want the ftpgrab feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and ftpgrab fits your workflow better

full ftpgrab profile →

About ansible

Ansible is a radically simple, agentless IT automation platform, written in Python and licensed under GPL 3.0, that handles configuration management, application deployment, cloud provisioning, ad hoc task execution, network automation, and multi node orchestration for operators, developers, and network and cloud teams who manage machines over plain SSH.

read the full ansible overview →

About ftpgrab

FTPGrab is an MIT licensed Go command line tool and container image that pulls files from remote FTP and SFTP servers onto a NAS, server, or computer on a schedule, built for unattended transfers in seedbox, home server, and similar setups.

read the full ftpgrab overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs Kestra ansible vs haystack ansible vs rancher ansible vs Prefect ansible vs Archon ansible vs Temporal ansible vs rowboat ansible vs Trigger

Frequently asked questions

Is ansible or ftpgrab more popular?

ansible has 70,721 GitHub stars and ftpgrab has 562. ansible has the larger community by that measure.

Are ansible and ftpgrab free?

Both are open source. ansible is licensed under GPL-3.0 and ftpgrab under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ansible and ftpgrab?

ansible is written in Python and ftpgrab in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ansible or ftpgrab?

Choose ansible if you want the larger community (70,721 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose ftpgrab if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.