head to head · open source

amnezia-client vs SoftEtherVPN

amnezia-client has 15,351 GitHub stars, 1,183 forks, 1,126 open issues and last shipped yesterday. SoftEtherVPN has 13,613 stars, 2,782 forks, 296 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. amnezia-client leads on adoption by 13% (15,351 vs 13,613 stars). amnezia-client is written in C++ under GPL-3.0; SoftEtherVPN is written in C under Apache-2.0. amnezia-client has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, SoftEtherVPN 20%. amnezia-client was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (openvpn, vpn), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

amnezia-client ★ 15K SoftEtherVPN ★ 14K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

amnezia-client SoftEtherVPN
GitHub stars ★ 15K ★ 14K
License GPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in C++ C
Last push 2026-10-06 2026-10-01
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 2.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick amnezia-client if

  • You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full amnezia-client profile →

pick SoftEtherVPN if

  • You want the SoftEtherVPN feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and SoftEtherVPN fits your workflow better

full SoftEtherVPN profile →

About amnezia-client

Amnezia VPN Client is an open source, GPL 3.0 licensed VPN client for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS that connects to a VPN and also deploys a self hosted VPN server onto hardware the user already controls.

read the full amnezia-client overview →

About SoftEtherVPN

SoftEther VPN is an open source, cross platform, multi protocol VPN server and client, written in C and licensed under Apache 2.0, intended for administrators and self hosters who need one program to serve many VPN protocols instead of running several separate daemons.

read the full SoftEtherVPN overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 116K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx caddy vs traefik frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

amnezia-client vs frp amnezia-client vs caddy amnezia-client vs traefik amnezia-client vs AdGuardHome amnezia-client vs nginx amnezia-client vs algo amnezia-client vs nginx-proxy amnezia-client vs goproxy amnezia-client vs openvpn-install amnezia-client vs cloudflared amnezia-client vs OpenVPN amnezia-client vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is amnezia-client or SoftEtherVPN more popular?

amnezia-client has 15,351 GitHub stars and SoftEtherVPN has 13,613. amnezia-client has the larger community by that measure.

Are amnezia-client and SoftEtherVPN free?

Both are open source. amnezia-client is licensed under GPL-3.0 and SoftEtherVPN under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between amnezia-client and SoftEtherVPN?

amnezia-client is written in C++ and SoftEtherVPN in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, amnezia-client or SoftEtherVPN?

Choose amnezia-client if you want the larger community (15,351 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose SoftEtherVPN if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.