head to head · open source

algo vs SoftEtherVPN

algo has 30,388 GitHub stars, 2,366 forks, 77 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. SoftEtherVPN has 13,571 stars, 2,781 forks, 296 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. algo leads on adoption by 124% (30,388 vs 13,571 stars). algo is written in Python under AGPL-3.0; SoftEtherVPN is written in C under Apache-2.0. algo has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, SoftEtherVPN 20%. SoftEtherVPN was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ipsec, vpn), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

algo ★ 30K SoftEtherVPN ★ 14K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

algo SoftEtherVPN
GitHub stars ★ 30K ★ 14K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Python C
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-09-13
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 2.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick algo if

  • You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full algo profile →

pick SoftEtherVPN if

  • You want the SoftEtherVPN feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and SoftEtherVPN fits your workflow better

full SoftEtherVPN profile →

About algo

Algo VPN is a set of Ansible scripts from Trail of Bits, written in Python and released under AGPL 3.0, that turns a fresh cloud virtual machine into a personal WireGuard and IPsec VPN server, and it is aimed at individuals and small teams who want to run their own VPN instead of trusting a hosted provider.

read the full algo overview →

About SoftEtherVPN

SoftEther VPN is an open source, cross platform, multi protocol VPN server and client, written in C and licensed under Apache 2.0, intended for administrators and self hosters who need one program to serve many VPN protocols instead of running several separate daemons.

read the full SoftEtherVPN overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs algo frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx caddy vs traefik frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

algo vs frp algo vs caddy algo vs traefik algo vs AdGuardHome algo vs nginx algo vs nginx-proxy algo vs goproxy algo vs openvpn-install algo vs amnezia-client algo vs OpenVPN algo vs coredns algo vs sliver

Frequently asked questions

Is algo or SoftEtherVPN more popular?

algo has 30,388 GitHub stars and SoftEtherVPN has 13,571. algo has the larger community by that measure.

Are algo and SoftEtherVPN free?

Both are open source. algo is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SoftEtherVPN under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between algo and SoftEtherVPN?

algo is written in Python and SoftEtherVPN in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, algo or SoftEtherVPN?

Choose algo if you want the larger community (30,388 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose SoftEtherVPN if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.