head to head · open source

aircrack-ng vs pwndoc

aircrack-ng has 7,659 GitHub stars, 1,375 forks, 462 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. pwndoc has 2,895 stars, 519 forks, 122 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. aircrack-ng leads on adoption by 165% (7,659 vs 2,895 stars). aircrack-ng is written in C under GPL-2.0; pwndoc is written in JavaScript under MIT. aircrack-ng has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, pwndoc 18%. pwndoc was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (audit, security), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

aircrack-ng ★ 7.7K pwndoc ★ 2.9K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

aircrack-ng pwndoc
GitHub stars ★ 7.7K ★ 2.9K
License GPL-2.0 MIT
Written in C JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-09-10
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 519
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick aircrack-ng if

  • You weight community size — 7.7K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full aircrack-ng profile →

pick pwndoc if

  • You want the pwndoc feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and pwndoc fits your workflow better

full pwndoc profile →

About aircrack-ng

Aircrack ng is a GPL 2.0 licensed suite of WiFi security auditing tools written in C, intended for network auditors, penetration testers, and compliance and risk management teams who assess wireless networks on hardware they control.

read the full aircrack-ng overview →

About pwndoc

PwnDoc is a JavaScript pentest reporting application released under the MIT license. It lives in the information security and penetration testing ecosystem, and it is positioned as a tool for audit work, vulnerability reporting, and compliance or risk management workflows. The project describes itself as a pentest report generator, with the stated aim of helping users spend more time testing and less time documenting by sharing data such as vulnerabilities among users.

read the full pwndoc overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

lighthouse vs teleport lighthouse vs lynis lighthouse vs prowler lighthouse vs gs-quant lighthouse vs opa lighthouse vs amphion lighthouse vs checkov lighthouse vs kyverno opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip

More Compliance & Risk Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.

aircrack-ng vs lighthouse aircrack-ng vs teleport aircrack-ng vs lynis aircrack-ng vs prowler aircrack-ng vs gs-quant aircrack-ng vs opa aircrack-ng vs Amphion aircrack-ng vs checkov aircrack-ng vs kyverno aircrack-ng vs tfsec aircrack-ng vs rundeck aircrack-ng vs agent-governance-toolkit

Frequently asked questions

Is aircrack-ng or pwndoc more popular?

aircrack-ng has 7,659 GitHub stars and pwndoc has 2,895. aircrack-ng has the larger community by that measure.

Are aircrack-ng and pwndoc free?

Both are open source. aircrack-ng is licensed under GPL-2.0 and pwndoc under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between aircrack-ng and pwndoc?

aircrack-ng is written in C and pwndoc in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, aircrack-ng or pwndoc?

Choose aircrack-ng if you want the larger community (7,659 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose pwndoc if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.