head to head · open source

agent-orchestrator vs PatrowlManager

agent-orchestrator has 14,059 GitHub stars, 1,912 forks, 711 open issues and last shipped yesterday. PatrowlManager has 639 stars, 111 forks, 257 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. agent-orchestrator leads on adoption by 2,100% (14,059 vs 639 stars). agent-orchestrator is written in Go under Apache-2.0; PatrowlManager is written in HTML under AGPL-3.0. agent-orchestrator has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, PatrowlManager 17%. agent-orchestrator was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

agent-orchestrator ★ 14K PatrowlManager ★ 639 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

agent-orchestrator PatrowlManager
GitHub stars ★ 14K ★ 639
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Go HTML
Last push 2026-11-04 2026-03-10
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 111
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick agent-orchestrator if

  • You weight community size — 14K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full agent-orchestrator profile →

pick PatrowlManager if

  • You want the PatrowlManager feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and PatrowlManager fits your workflow better

full PatrowlManager profile →

About agent-orchestrator

Agent Orchestrator Plan, run, and supervise coding agents from one place. Give every coding task its own agent, workspace, and feedback loop. Plan and delegate larger outcomes with a project aware orchestrator. Follow every worker, pull request, CI run, and review in a live Kanban. Download AO • Documentation • Releases • Contributing • Discord English · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 · Español · Français · Deutsch · Português (Brasil) A workspace for agent driven development One coding agent can handle a task. Running several across a project creates a different job: deciding what matters, splitting work…

read the full agent-orchestrator overview →

About PatrowlManager

PatrOwl PatrOwl is a scalable, free and open source solution for orchestrating Security Operations. PatrowlManager is the Front end application for managing the assets, reviewing risks on real time, orchestrating the operations (scans, searches, API calls, ...), aggregating the results, relaying alerts on third parties (ex: Incident Response platform like TheHive, Splunk, ...) and providing the reports and dashboards. Operations are performed by the PatrowlEngines instances. Don't forget to install and deploy them ;) Project pitch desk Try it now! To try PatrOwl, install it by reading the Installation Guide and…

read the full PatrowlManager overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

Frequently asked questions

Is agent-orchestrator or PatrowlManager more popular?

agent-orchestrator has 14,059 GitHub stars and PatrowlManager has 639. agent-orchestrator has the larger community by that measure.

Are agent-orchestrator and PatrowlManager free?

Both are open source. agent-orchestrator is licensed under Apache-2.0 and PatrowlManager under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between agent-orchestrator and PatrowlManager?

agent-orchestrator is written in Go and PatrowlManager in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, agent-orchestrator or PatrowlManager?

Choose agent-orchestrator if you want the larger community (14,059 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose PatrowlManager if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.