head to head · open source

Archon vs agent-orchestrator

Archon has 23,505 GitHub stars, 3,474 forks, 321 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. agent-orchestrator has 12,195 stars, 1,685 forks, 711 open issues and last shipped today. Archon leads on adoption by 93% (23,505 vs 12,195 stars). Archon is written in TypeScript under MIT; agent-orchestrator is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Archon has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, agent-orchestrator 14%. agent-orchestrator was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Archon ★ 24K agent-orchestrator ★ 12K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Archon agent-orchestrator
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 12K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 3.5K ⑂ 1.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Archon if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Archon profile →

pick agent-orchestrator if

  • You want the agent-orchestrator feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and agent-orchestrator fits your workflow better

full agent-orchestrator profile →

About Archon

Archon is an open source workflow engine for AI coding agents, written in TypeScript and released under the MIT license. It lives in the AI coding ecosystem, alongside tools such as Claude Code, and is distributed through the Bun runtime and the GitHub CLI. The project describes itself as a harness builder: it lets a developer encode a development process as a YAML workflow and then run that workflow reliably across projects. Workflows are stored in a .archon/workflows/ directory and committed to the repository, so the same definition can be invoked from the CLI, a web UI, Slack, Telegram, or GitHub.…

read the full Archon overview →

About agent-orchestrator

Agent Orchestrator is an open source desktop workspace for running and supervising teams of coding agents, written in Go and released under the Apache 2.0 license. It lives in the agent orchestration ecosystem, alongside the coding harnesses it drives, and it is distributed as a local application rather than as a hosted service. The project describes itself as a place to plan, run, and supervise coding agents from one place, giving every coding task its own agent, workspace, and feedback loop.

read the full agent-orchestrator overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

Archon vs ansible Archon vs compose Archon vs conductor Archon vs xxl-job Archon vs gitleaks Archon vs Kestra Archon vs haystack Archon vs rancher Archon vs Prefect Archon vs Temporal Archon vs rowboat Archon vs Trigger

Frequently asked questions

Is Archon or agent-orchestrator more popular?

Archon has 23,505 GitHub stars and agent-orchestrator has 12,195. Archon has the larger community by that measure.

Are Archon and agent-orchestrator free?

Both are open source. Archon is licensed under MIT and agent-orchestrator under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Archon and agent-orchestrator?

Archon is written in TypeScript and agent-orchestrator in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Archon or agent-orchestrator?

Choose Archon if you want the larger community (23,505 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose agent-orchestrator if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.