head to head · open source
agent-orchestrator vs OpenOPC-Shadow-Adapter
agent-orchestrator has 13,426 GitHub stars, 1,845 forks, 711 open issues and last shipped today. OpenOPC-Shadow-Adapter has 2,190 stars, 2 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. agent-orchestrator leads on adoption by 513% (13,426 vs 2,190 stars). agent-orchestrator is written in Go under Apache-2.0; OpenOPC-Shadow-Adapter is written in Python under MIT. agent-orchestrator has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, OpenOPC-Shadow-Adapter 0%. agent-orchestrator was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| agent-orchestrator | OpenOPC-Shadow-Adapter | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 13K | ★ 2.2K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-21 | 2026-10-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.8K | ⑂ 2 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick agent-orchestrator if
- You weight community size — 13K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick OpenOPC-Shadow-Adapter if
- You want the OpenOPC-Shadow-Adapter feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and OpenOPC-Shadow-Adapter fits your workflow better
About agent-orchestrator
Agent Orchestrator Plan, run, and supervise coding agents from one place. Give every coding task its own agent, workspace, and feedback loop. Plan and delegate larger outcomes with a project aware orchestrator. Follow every worker, pull request, CI run, and review in a live Kanban. Download AO • Documentation • Releases • Contributing • Discord English · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 · Español · Français · Deutsch · Português (Brasil) A workspace for agent driven development One coding agent can handle a task. Running several across a project creates a different job: deciding what matters, splitting work…
read the full agent-orchestrator overview →
About OpenOPC-Shadow-Adapter
OpenOPC Shadow Adapter Non Blocking Human in the Loop (HITL) & BYOC Infrastructure for OpenOPC AI Agent Employees For Your Compan The Carbon Silicon Continuum: Real Humans & Remote PCs as First Class OpenOPC Employees Built for OpenOPC Zero Core Modifications Production Release v0.1.0 What is OpenOPC Shadow Adapter? openopc shadow adapter is a high concurrency Temporal Bridge for OpenOPC. It allows OpenOPC agentic DAGs to pause non blockingly when a role requires human sign off (Carbon) or remote GPU execution (Silicon BYOC), without causing engine timeouts or stalling parallel branches. 1. Non Blocking…
read the full OpenOPC-Shadow-Adapter overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is agent-orchestrator or OpenOPC-Shadow-Adapter more popular?
agent-orchestrator has 13,426 GitHub stars and OpenOPC-Shadow-Adapter has 2,190. agent-orchestrator has the larger community by that measure.
Are agent-orchestrator and OpenOPC-Shadow-Adapter free?
Both are open source. agent-orchestrator is licensed under Apache-2.0 and OpenOPC-Shadow-Adapter under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between agent-orchestrator and OpenOPC-Shadow-Adapter?
agent-orchestrator is written in Go and OpenOPC-Shadow-Adapter in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, agent-orchestrator or OpenOPC-Shadow-Adapter?
Choose agent-orchestrator if you want the larger community (13,426 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose OpenOPC-Shadow-Adapter if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.