head to head · open source

agent-orchestrator vs dbos-transact-py

agent-orchestrator has 14,021 GitHub stars, 1,911 forks, 711 open issues and last shipped yesterday. dbos-transact-py has 1,663 stars, 115 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped yesterday. agent-orchestrator leads on adoption by 743% (14,021 vs 1,663 stars). agent-orchestrator is written in Go under Apache-2.0; dbos-transact-py is written in Python under MIT. agent-orchestrator has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, dbos-transact-py 7%. agent-orchestrator was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

agent-orchestrator ★ 14K dbos-transact-py ★ 1.7K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

agent-orchestrator dbos-transact-py
GitHub stars ★ 14K ★ 1.7K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 115
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick agent-orchestrator if

  • You weight community size — 14K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full agent-orchestrator profile →

pick dbos-transact-py if

  • You want the dbos-transact-py feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and dbos-transact-py fits your workflow better

full dbos-transact-py profile →

About agent-orchestrator

Agent Orchestrator Plan, run, and supervise coding agents from one place. Give every coding task its own agent, workspace, and feedback loop. Plan and delegate larger outcomes with a project aware orchestrator. Follow every worker, pull request, CI run, and review in a live Kanban. Download AO • Documentation • Releases • Contributing • Discord English · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 · Español · Français · Deutsch · Português (Brasil) A workspace for agent driven development One coding agent can handle a task. Running several across a project creates a different job: deciding what matters, splitting work…

read the full agent-orchestrator overview →

About dbos-transact-py

DBOS Transact: Lightweight Durable Workflows Documentation • Examples • Github • Discord What is DBOS? DBOS provides lightweight durable workflows built on top of Postgres. Instead of managing your own workflow orchestrator or task queue system, you can use DBOS to add durable workflows and queues to your program in just a few lines of code. To get started, follow the quickstart to install this open source library and connect it to a Postgres database. Then, annotate workflows and steps in your program to make it durable! That's all you need to do—DBOS is entirely contained in this open source library…

read the full dbos-transact-py overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

Frequently asked questions

Is agent-orchestrator or dbos-transact-py more popular?

agent-orchestrator has 14,021 GitHub stars and dbos-transact-py has 1,663. agent-orchestrator has the larger community by that measure.

Are agent-orchestrator and dbos-transact-py free?

Both are open source. agent-orchestrator is licensed under Apache-2.0 and dbos-transact-py under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between agent-orchestrator and dbos-transact-py?

agent-orchestrator is written in Go and dbos-transact-py in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, agent-orchestrator or dbos-transact-py?

Choose agent-orchestrator if you want the larger community (14,021 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose dbos-transact-py if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.