head to head · open source
AdGuardHome vs zoraxy
AdGuardHome has 38,266 GitHub stars, 2,604 forks, 1,253 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. zoraxy has 5,572 stars, 333 forks, 159 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. AdGuardHome leads on adoption by 587% (38,266 vs 5,572 stars). AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0; zoraxy is written in HTML under AGPL-3.0. AdGuardHome has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, zoraxy 6%. AdGuardHome was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (golang), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| AdGuardHome | zoraxy | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 38K | ★ 5.6K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-11-05 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.6K | ⑂ 333 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick AdGuardHome if
- You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick zoraxy if
- You want the zoraxy feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and zoraxy fits your workflow better
About AdGuardHome
Privacy protection center for you and your devices Free and open source, powerful network wide ads & trackers blocking DNS server. AdGuard.com Wiki Reddit Twitter Telegram AdGuard Home is a network wide software for blocking ads and tracking. After you set it up, it'll cover ALL your home devices, and you don't need any client side software for that. It operates as a DNS server that re routes tracking domains to a “black hole”, thus preventing your devices from connecting to those servers. It's based on software we use for our public [AdGuard DNS] servers, and both share a lot of code. [AdGuard DNS]: Getting…
read the full AdGuardHome overview →
About zoraxy
Zoraxy A general purpose HTTP reverse proxy and forwarding tool. Now written in Go! Features Simple to use interface with detail in system instructions Reverse Proxy (HTTP/2) Virtual Directory WebSocket Proxy (automatic, no set up needed) Basic Auth Alias Hostnames Custom Headers Load Balancing Redirection Rules TLS / SSL setup and deploy ACME features like auto renew to serve your sites in http s SNI support (and SAN certs) DNS Challenge for Let's Encrypt and these DNS providers Blacklist / Whitelist by country or IP address (single IP, CIDR or wildcard for beginners) Stream Proxy (TCP & UDP) Integrated Up time…
read the full zoraxy overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Networking & Connectivity projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.
Frequently asked questions
Is AdGuardHome or zoraxy more popular?
AdGuardHome has 38,266 GitHub stars and zoraxy has 5,572. AdGuardHome has the larger community by that measure.
Are AdGuardHome and zoraxy free?
Both are open source. AdGuardHome is licensed under GPL-3.0 and zoraxy under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between AdGuardHome and zoraxy?
AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript and zoraxy in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, AdGuardHome or zoraxy?
Choose AdGuardHome if you want the larger community (38,266 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose zoraxy if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.