head to head · open source
AdGuardHome vs WR.DO
AdGuardHome has 36,970 GitHub stars, 2,520 forks, 1,253 open issues and last shipped yesterday. WR.DO has 2,279 stars, 364 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. AdGuardHome leads on adoption by 1,522% (36,970 vs 2,279 stars). AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0; WR.DO is written in TypeScript under MIT. AdGuardHome has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, WR.DO 16%. AdGuardHome was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 15422 open source comparisons
Side by side
| AdGuardHome | WR.DO | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 37K | ★ 2.3K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-12 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.5K | ⑂ 364 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick AdGuardHome if
- You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick WR.DO if
- You want the WR.DO feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and WR.DO fits your workflow better
About AdGuardHome
AdGuard Home is a free and open source, network wide DNS server that blocks ads and trackers for every device on a network, aimed at self hosters, homelab operators, and network administrators who want filtering without installing client side software on each device.
read the full AdGuardHome overview →
About WR.DO
WR.DO free open source MIT TypeScript Next.js self hosted one stop domain service platform. It combines short link generation, unlimited domain email, Cloudflare subdomain management, S3 compatible file storage, open API, admin panel. It targets operators needing one control plane for DNS records, links, mailboxes, files, users.
read the full WR.DO overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Networking & Connectivity projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.
Frequently asked questions
Is AdGuardHome or WR.DO more popular?
AdGuardHome has 36,970 GitHub stars and WR.DO has 2,279. AdGuardHome has the larger community by that measure.
Are AdGuardHome and WR.DO free?
Both are open source. AdGuardHome is licensed under GPL-3.0 and WR.DO under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between AdGuardHome and WR.DO?
AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript and WR.DO in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, AdGuardHome or WR.DO?
Choose AdGuardHome if you want the larger community (36,970 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose WR.DO if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.