head to head · open source

AdGuardHome vs sliver

AdGuardHome has 36,970 GitHub stars, 2,520 forks, 1,253 open issues and last shipped yesterday. sliver has 11,852 stars, 1,587 forks, 222 open issues and last shipped yesterday. AdGuardHome leads on adoption by 212% (36,970 vs 11,852 stars). AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0; sliver is written in Go under GPL-3.0. AdGuardHome has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, sliver 13%. AdGuardHome was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (dns, golang), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AdGuardHome ★ 37K sliver ★ 12K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

AdGuardHome sliver
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 12K
License GPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 2.5K ⑂ 1.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AdGuardHome if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AdGuardHome profile →

pick sliver if

  • You want the sliver feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and sliver fits your workflow better

full sliver profile →

About AdGuardHome

AdGuard Home is a free and open source, network wide DNS server that blocks ads and trackers for every device on a network, aimed at self hosters, homelab operators, and network administrators who want filtering without installing client side software on each device.

read the full AdGuardHome overview →

About sliver

Sliver is an open source, cross platform adversary emulation and red team framework written in Go, used by security teams of all sizes to perform authorized security testing with implants that support command and control over Mutual TLS (mTLS), WireGuard, HTTP(S), and DNS.

read the full sliver overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

immich vs openvpn immich vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs openvpn worldmonitor vs openvpn mall vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs wr-do worldmonitor vs wr-do mall vs wr-do n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

AdGuardHome vs frp AdGuardHome vs caddy AdGuardHome vs traefik AdGuardHome vs nginx AdGuardHome vs algo AdGuardHome vs openvpn-install AdGuardHome vs amnezia-client AdGuardHome vs OpenVPN AdGuardHome vs coredns AdGuardHome vs smartdns AdGuardHome vs OpenSurge-for-Mac AdGuardHome vs WR.DO

Frequently asked questions

Is AdGuardHome or sliver more popular?

AdGuardHome has 36,970 GitHub stars and sliver has 11,852. AdGuardHome has the larger community by that measure.

Are AdGuardHome and sliver free?

Both are open source. AdGuardHome is licensed under GPL-3.0 and sliver under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AdGuardHome and sliver?

AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript and sliver in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AdGuardHome or sliver?

Choose AdGuardHome if you want the larger community (36,970 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose sliver if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.