head to head · open source
AdGuardHome vs sliver
AdGuardHome has 38,073 GitHub stars, 2,589 forks, 1,253 open issues and last shipped yesterday. sliver has 12,218 stars, 1,641 forks, 222 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. AdGuardHome leads on adoption by 212% (38,073 vs 12,218 stars). AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0; sliver is written in Go under GPL-3.0. AdGuardHome has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, sliver 13%. AdGuardHome was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (dns, golang), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| AdGuardHome | sliver | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 38K | ★ 12K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-26 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.6K | ⑂ 1.6K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick AdGuardHome if
- You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick sliver if
- You want the sliver feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and sliver fits your workflow better
About AdGuardHome
Privacy protection center for you and your devices Free and open source, powerful network wide ads & trackers blocking DNS server. AdGuard.com Wiki Reddit Twitter Telegram AdGuard Home is a network wide software for blocking ads and tracking. After you set it up, it'll cover ALL your home devices, and you don't need any client side software for that. It operates as a DNS server that re routes tracking domains to a “black hole”, thus preventing your devices from connecting to those servers. It's based on software we use for our public [AdGuard DNS] servers, and both share a lot of code. [AdGuard DNS]: Getting…
read the full AdGuardHome overview →
About sliver
Sliver Sliver is an open source cross platform adversary emulation/red team framework, it can be used by organizations of all sizes to perform security testing. Sliver's implants support C2 over Mutual TLS (mTLS), WireGuard, HTTP(S), and DNS and are dynamically compiled with per binary asymmetric encryption keys. The server and client support MacOS, Windows, and Linux. Implants are supported on MacOS, Windows, and Linux (and possibly every Golang compiler target but we've not tested them all). Visit for tutorials and documentation. Features Dynamic code generation Compile time obfuscation Multiplayer mode Staged…
read the full sliver overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Networking & Connectivity projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.
Frequently asked questions
Is AdGuardHome or sliver more popular?
AdGuardHome has 38,073 GitHub stars and sliver has 12,218. AdGuardHome has the larger community by that measure.
Are AdGuardHome and sliver free?
Both are open source. AdGuardHome is licensed under GPL-3.0 and sliver under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between AdGuardHome and sliver?
AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript and sliver in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, AdGuardHome or sliver?
Choose AdGuardHome if you want the larger community (38,073 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose sliver if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.