head to head · open source

AdGuardHome vs pivpn

AdGuardHome has 36,990 GitHub stars, 2,523 forks, 1,253 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. pivpn has 8,043 stars, 682 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 21 days ago. AdGuardHome leads on adoption by 360% (36,990 vs 8,043 stars). AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0; pivpn is written in Shell under MIT. AdGuardHome has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, pivpn 8%. AdGuardHome was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AdGuardHome ★ 37K pivpn ★ 8.0K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

AdGuardHome pivpn
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 8.0K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript Shell
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-08-30
Forks ⑂ 2.5K ⑂ 682
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AdGuardHome if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AdGuardHome profile →

pick pivpn if

  • You want the pivpn feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You evaluated both and pivpn fits your workflow better

full pivpn profile →

About AdGuardHome

AdGuard Home is a free and open source, network wide DNS server that blocks ads and trackers for every device on a network, aimed at self hosters, homelab operators, and network administrators who want filtering without installing client side software on each device.

read the full AdGuardHome overview →

About pivpn

PiVPN is a set of open source shell scripts that turns a Raspberry Pi, or an Ubuntu or Debian server, into a self hosted VPN server running WireGuard or OpenVPN, and it is built for people who want a cost effective personal VPN at home without having to become a networking expert.

read the full pivpn overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

immich vs openvpn immich vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs openvpn worldmonitor vs openvpn mall vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs wr-do worldmonitor vs wr-do mall vs wr-do n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

AdGuardHome vs frp AdGuardHome vs caddy AdGuardHome vs traefik AdGuardHome vs nginx AdGuardHome vs algo AdGuardHome vs nginx-proxy AdGuardHome vs goproxy AdGuardHome vs openvpn-install AdGuardHome vs amnezia-client AdGuardHome vs OpenVPN AdGuardHome vs coredns AdGuardHome vs SoftEtherVPN

Frequently asked questions

Is AdGuardHome or pivpn more popular?

AdGuardHome has 36,990 GitHub stars and pivpn has 8,043. AdGuardHome has the larger community by that measure.

Are AdGuardHome and pivpn free?

Both are open source. AdGuardHome is licensed under GPL-3.0 and pivpn under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AdGuardHome and pivpn?

AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript and pivpn in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AdGuardHome or pivpn?

Choose AdGuardHome if you want the larger community (36,990 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose pivpn if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.