head to head · open source

AdGuardHome vs numa

AdGuardHome has 37,117 GitHub stars, 2,527 forks, 1,253 open issues and last shipped today. numa has 1,513 stars, 107 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped yesterday. AdGuardHome leads on adoption by 2,353% (37,117 vs 1,513 stars). AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0; numa is written in Rust under MIT. AdGuardHome has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, numa 7%. AdGuardHome was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (dns), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AdGuardHome ★ 37K numa ★ 1.5K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

AdGuardHome numa
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 1.5K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-29 2026-09-28
Forks ⑂ 2.5K ⑂ 107
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AdGuardHome if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AdGuardHome profile →

pick numa if

  • You want the numa feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and numa fits your workflow better

full numa profile →

About AdGuardHome

AdGuard Home is a free and open source, network wide DNS server that blocks ads and trackers for every device on a network, aimed at self hosters, homelab operators, and network administrators who want filtering without installing client side software on each device.

read the full AdGuardHome overview →

About numa

numa is a portable DNS resolver written in Rust and shipped as a single roughly 8 MB binary, aimed at developers, self hosters and privacy conscious laptop users who want ad blocking, .numa local service names, hostname overrides and ODoH encrypted upstream queries without a cloud account or a Raspberry Pi.

read the full numa overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs adguardhome frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs nginx caddy vs traefik frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

AdGuardHome vs frp AdGuardHome vs caddy AdGuardHome vs traefik AdGuardHome vs nginx AdGuardHome vs algo AdGuardHome vs nginx-proxy AdGuardHome vs goproxy AdGuardHome vs openvpn-install AdGuardHome vs cloudflared AdGuardHome vs amnezia-client AdGuardHome vs OpenVPN AdGuardHome vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is AdGuardHome or numa more popular?

AdGuardHome has 37,117 GitHub stars and numa has 1,513. AdGuardHome has the larger community by that measure.

Are AdGuardHome and numa free?

Both are open source. AdGuardHome is licensed under GPL-3.0 and numa under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AdGuardHome and numa?

AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript and numa in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AdGuardHome or numa?

Choose AdGuardHome if you want the larger community (37,117 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose numa if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.