head to head · open source

AdGuardHome vs Kathara

AdGuardHome has 37,226 GitHub stars, 2,534 forks, 1,253 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Kathara has 645 stars, 86 forks, 16 open issues and last shipped yesterday. AdGuardHome leads on adoption by 5,671% (37,226 vs 645 stars). AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0; Kathara is written in Python under GPL-3.0. AdGuardHome has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Kathara 13%. Kathara was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AdGuardHome ★ 37K Kathara ★ 645 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

AdGuardHome Kathara
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 645
License GPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-10-02 2026-10-04
Forks ⑂ 2.5K ⑂ 86
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AdGuardHome if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AdGuardHome profile →

pick Kathara if

  • You want the Kathara feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Kathara fits your workflow better

full Kathara profile →

About AdGuardHome

AdGuard Home is a free and open source, network wide DNS server that blocks ads and trackers for every device on a network, aimed at self hosters, homelab operators, and network administrators who want filtering without installing client side software on each device.

read the full AdGuardHome overview →

About Kathara

Kathará is a lightweight, container based network emulation system for network engineers, students, and researchers who need to build, test, and demonstrate virtual networks on Docker or Kubernetes.

read the full Kathara overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 116K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs adguardhome frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs nginx caddy vs traefik frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

AdGuardHome vs frp AdGuardHome vs caddy AdGuardHome vs traefik AdGuardHome vs nginx AdGuardHome vs algo AdGuardHome vs nginx-proxy AdGuardHome vs goproxy AdGuardHome vs openvpn-install AdGuardHome vs cloudflared AdGuardHome vs amnezia-client AdGuardHome vs OpenVPN AdGuardHome vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is AdGuardHome or Kathara more popular?

AdGuardHome has 37,226 GitHub stars and Kathara has 645. AdGuardHome has the larger community by that measure.

Are AdGuardHome and Kathara free?

Both are open source. AdGuardHome is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Kathara under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AdGuardHome and Kathara?

AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript and Kathara in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AdGuardHome or Kathara?

Choose AdGuardHome if you want the larger community (37,226 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Kathara if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.