head to head · open source
AdGuardHome vs go-emby2openlist
AdGuardHome has 38,073 GitHub stars, 2,589 forks, 1,253 open issues and last shipped yesterday. go-emby2openlist has 674 stars, 71 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. AdGuardHome leads on adoption by 5,549% (38,073 vs 674 stars). AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0; go-emby2openlist is written in Go under GPL-3.0. AdGuardHome has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, go-emby2openlist 11%. AdGuardHome was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| AdGuardHome | go-emby2openlist | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 38K | ★ 674 |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.6K | ⑂ 71 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick AdGuardHome if
- You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick go-emby2openlist if
- You want the go-emby2openlist feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and go-emby2openlist fits your workflow better
About AdGuardHome
Privacy protection center for you and your devices Free and open source, powerful network wide ads & trackers blocking DNS server. AdGuard.com Wiki Reddit Twitter Telegram AdGuard Home is a network wide software for blocking ads and tracking. After you set it up, it'll cover ALL your home devices, and you don't need any client side software for that. It operates as a DNS server that re routes tracking domains to a “black hole”, thus preventing your devices from connecting to those servers. It's based on software we use for our public [AdGuard DNS] servers, and both share a lot of code. [AdGuard DNS]: Getting…
read the full AdGuardHome overview →
About go-emby2openlist
go emby2openlist Go 语言编写的 Emby + OpenList 网盘直链反向代理服务，深度适配阿里云盘转码播放。 小白必看 网盘直链反向代理 : 正常情况下，Emby 通过磁盘挂载的形式间接读取网盘资源，走的是服务器代理模式，看一个视频时数据链路是： 客户端 = Emby 源服务器 = 磁盘挂载服务 = OpenList = 网盘 客户端 客户端 = Emby 反代服务器 = Emby 源服务器 （请求 Emby Api 接口） 客户端 客户端 = Emby 反代服务器 = OpenList = 网盘 （请求视频直链） 客户端 客户端 = 网盘（客户端拿着网盘的直链直接观看，此时已经没有服务器的事情了，故不会再消耗服务器流量） 这种方式的好处： 1. 观看时加载速度拉满（前提是有网盘会员） 2. 在客户端处解码，能不能看 4K 取决于你电视盒子的性能 使用前须知 1. 本项目初衷: 易用轻巧、小白友好、深度适配阿里云盘 (如果你使用本项目观看其他网盘时出现问题，也欢迎到 issue 区反馈，我会尽量适配它) 2. 如果你有更复杂的需求, 推荐使用功能更完善的反向代理服务：bpking1/embyExternalUrl 功能 OpenList 网盘原画直链播放 Strm 直链播放 OpenList 本地目录树生成 自定义注入 js/css（web） OpenList 网盘转码直链播放（阿里云盘）…
read the full go-emby2openlist overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Networking & Connectivity projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.
Frequently asked questions
Is AdGuardHome or go-emby2openlist more popular?
AdGuardHome has 38,073 GitHub stars and go-emby2openlist has 674. AdGuardHome has the larger community by that measure.
Are AdGuardHome and go-emby2openlist free?
Both are open source. AdGuardHome is licensed under GPL-3.0 and go-emby2openlist under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between AdGuardHome and go-emby2openlist?
AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript and go-emby2openlist in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, AdGuardHome or go-emby2openlist?
Choose AdGuardHome if you want the larger community (38,073 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose go-emby2openlist if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.