head to head · open source

AdGuardHome vs DnsClient.NET

AdGuardHome has 37,186 GitHub stars, 2,531 forks, 1,253 open issues and last shipped yesterday. DnsClient.NET has 880 stars, 149 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. AdGuardHome leads on adoption by 4,126% (37,186 vs 880 stars). AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0; DnsClient.NET is written in C# under Apache-2.0. AdGuardHome has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, DnsClient.NET 17%. AdGuardHome was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (dns), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AdGuardHome ★ 37K DnsClient.NET ★ 880 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

AdGuardHome DnsClient.NET
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 880
License GPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript C#
Last push 2026-10-02 2026-03-01
Forks ⑂ 2.5K ⑂ 149
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AdGuardHome if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AdGuardHome profile →

pick DnsClient.NET if

  • You want the DnsClient.NET feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and DnsClient.NET fits your workflow better

full DnsClient.NET profile →

About AdGuardHome

AdGuard Home is a free and open source, network wide DNS server that blocks ads and trackers for every device on a network, aimed at self hosters, homelab operators, and network administrators who want filtering without installing client side software on each device.

read the full AdGuardHome overview →

About DnsClient.NET

DnsClient.NET is a high performance open source DNS lookup library for .NET developers who need to query DNS records programmatically from C applications.

read the full DnsClient.NET overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs adguardhome frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs nginx caddy vs traefik frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

AdGuardHome vs frp AdGuardHome vs caddy AdGuardHome vs traefik AdGuardHome vs nginx AdGuardHome vs algo AdGuardHome vs nginx-proxy AdGuardHome vs goproxy AdGuardHome vs openvpn-install AdGuardHome vs cloudflared AdGuardHome vs amnezia-client AdGuardHome vs OpenVPN AdGuardHome vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is AdGuardHome or DnsClient.NET more popular?

AdGuardHome has 37,186 GitHub stars and DnsClient.NET has 880. AdGuardHome has the larger community by that measure.

Are AdGuardHome and DnsClient.NET free?

Both are open source. AdGuardHome is licensed under GPL-3.0 and DnsClient.NET under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AdGuardHome and DnsClient.NET?

AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript and DnsClient.NET in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AdGuardHome or DnsClient.NET?

Choose AdGuardHome if you want the larger community (37,186 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose DnsClient.NET if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.