head to head · open source

AdGuardHome vs dns-proxy-server

AdGuardHome has 37,226 GitHub stars, 2,534 forks, 1,253 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. dns-proxy-server has 854 stars, 81 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. AdGuardHome leads on adoption by 4,259% (37,226 vs 854 stars). AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0; dns-proxy-server is written in Java under Apache-2.0. AdGuardHome has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, dns-proxy-server 9%. AdGuardHome was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (dns), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AdGuardHome ★ 37K dns-proxy-server ★ 854 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

AdGuardHome dns-proxy-server
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 854
License GPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Java
Last push 2026-10-02 2026-04-29
Forks ⑂ 2.5K ⑂ 81
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AdGuardHome if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AdGuardHome profile →

pick dns-proxy-server if

  • You want the dns-proxy-server feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and dns-proxy-server fits your workflow better

full dns-proxy-server profile →

About AdGuardHome

AdGuard Home is a free and open source, network wide DNS server that blocks ads and trackers for every device on a network, aimed at self hosters, homelab operators, and network administrators who want filtering without installing client side software on each device.

read the full AdGuardHome overview →

About dns-proxy-server

dns proxy server (DPS) is a lightweight DNS server for developers and server administrators who need hostnames to resolve differently depending on Docker containers, local configuration, or the internet.

read the full dns-proxy-server overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 116K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs adguardhome frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs nginx caddy vs traefik frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

AdGuardHome vs frp AdGuardHome vs caddy AdGuardHome vs traefik AdGuardHome vs nginx AdGuardHome vs algo AdGuardHome vs nginx-proxy AdGuardHome vs goproxy AdGuardHome vs openvpn-install AdGuardHome vs cloudflared AdGuardHome vs amnezia-client AdGuardHome vs OpenVPN AdGuardHome vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is AdGuardHome or dns-proxy-server more popular?

AdGuardHome has 37,226 GitHub stars and dns-proxy-server has 854. AdGuardHome has the larger community by that measure.

Are AdGuardHome and dns-proxy-server free?

Both are open source. AdGuardHome is licensed under GPL-3.0 and dns-proxy-server under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AdGuardHome and dns-proxy-server?

AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript and dns-proxy-server in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AdGuardHome or dns-proxy-server?

Choose AdGuardHome if you want the larger community (37,226 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose dns-proxy-server if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.