head to head · open source

AdGuardHome vs bind9

AdGuardHome has 37,226 GitHub stars, 2,534 forks, 1,253 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. bind9 has 779 stars, 186 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped today. AdGuardHome leads on adoption by 4,679% (37,226 vs 779 stars). AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0; bind9 is written in C under MPL-2.0. AdGuardHome has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, bind9 24%. bind9 was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (dns), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AdGuardHome ★ 37K bind9 ★ 779 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

AdGuardHome bind9
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 779
License GPL-3.0 MPL-2.0
Written in TypeScript C
Last push 2026-10-02 2026-10-05
Forks ⑂ 2.5K ⑂ 186
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AdGuardHome if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AdGuardHome profile →

pick bind9 if

  • You want the bind9 feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and bind9 fits your workflow better

full bind9 profile →

About AdGuardHome

AdGuard Home is a free and open source, network wide DNS server that blocks ads and trackers for every device on a network, aimed at self hosters, homelab operators, and network administrators who want filtering without installing client side software on each device.

read the full AdGuardHome overview →

About bind9

BIND 9 is a complete, highly portable open source implementation of the Domain Name System protocol, written in C, for operators and organisations that need to run authoritative, recursive, or forwarding DNS infrastructure themselves.

read the full bind9 overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 116K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs adguardhome frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs nginx caddy vs traefik frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

AdGuardHome vs frp AdGuardHome vs caddy AdGuardHome vs traefik AdGuardHome vs nginx AdGuardHome vs algo AdGuardHome vs nginx-proxy AdGuardHome vs goproxy AdGuardHome vs openvpn-install AdGuardHome vs cloudflared AdGuardHome vs amnezia-client AdGuardHome vs OpenVPN AdGuardHome vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is AdGuardHome or bind9 more popular?

AdGuardHome has 37,226 GitHub stars and bind9 has 779. AdGuardHome has the larger community by that measure.

Are AdGuardHome and bind9 free?

Both are open source. AdGuardHome is licensed under GPL-3.0 and bind9 under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AdGuardHome and bind9?

AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript and bind9 in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AdGuardHome or bind9?

Choose AdGuardHome if you want the larger community (37,226 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose bind9 if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.