head to head · open source

AdGuardHome vs awl

AdGuardHome has 37,060 GitHub stars, 2,523 forks, 1,253 open issues and last shipped yesterday. awl has 684 stars, 45 forks, 35 open issues and last shipped 12 days ago. AdGuardHome leads on adoption by 5,318% (37,060 vs 684 stars). AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0; awl is written in Go under MPL-2.0. AdGuardHome has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, awl 7%. AdGuardHome was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (golang), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AdGuardHome ★ 37K awl ★ 684 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

AdGuardHome awl
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 684
License GPL-3.0 MPL-2.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-09-13
Forks ⑂ 2.5K ⑂ 45
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AdGuardHome if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AdGuardHome profile →

pick awl if

  • You want the awl feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and awl fits your workflow better

full awl profile →

About AdGuardHome

AdGuard Home is a free and open source, network wide DNS server that blocks ads and trackers for every device on a network, aimed at self hosters, homelab operators, and network administrators who want filtering without installing client side software on each device.

read the full AdGuardHome overview →

About awl

awl (Anywherelan) is an open source, fully peer to peer mesh VPN written in Go that gives your own devices stable .awl addresses so they can reach one another at the IP level from anywhere, aimed at self hosters, small groups of friends and personal device fleets of roughly tens of machines rather than at teams.

read the full awl overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs adguardhome frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs nginx caddy vs traefik frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

AdGuardHome vs frp AdGuardHome vs caddy AdGuardHome vs traefik AdGuardHome vs nginx AdGuardHome vs algo AdGuardHome vs nginx-proxy AdGuardHome vs goproxy AdGuardHome vs openvpn-install AdGuardHome vs cloudflared AdGuardHome vs amnezia-client AdGuardHome vs OpenVPN AdGuardHome vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is AdGuardHome or awl more popular?

AdGuardHome has 37,060 GitHub stars and awl has 684. AdGuardHome has the larger community by that measure.

Are AdGuardHome and awl free?

Both are open source. AdGuardHome is licensed under GPL-3.0 and awl under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AdGuardHome and awl?

AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript and awl in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AdGuardHome or awl?

Choose AdGuardHome if you want the larger community (37,060 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose awl if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.