head to head · open source

ActivityWatch vs Freeter

ActivityWatch has 18,919 GitHub stars, 1,012 forks, 186 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Freeter has 1,026 stars, 64 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. ActivityWatch leads on adoption by 1,744% (18,919 vs 1,026 stars). ActivityWatch is written in Python under MPL-2.0; Freeter is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. ActivityWatch has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Freeter 6%. ActivityWatch was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (app, productivity), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ActivityWatch ★ 19K Freeter ★ 1.0K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

ActivityWatch Freeter
GitHub stars ★ 19K ★ 1.0K
License MPL-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-05-27
Forks ⑂ 1.0K ⑂ 64
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ActivityWatch if

  • You weight community size — 19K stars and counting
  • You want the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ActivityWatch profile →

pick Freeter if

  • You want the Freeter feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Freeter fits your workflow better

full Freeter profile →

About ActivityWatch

ActivityWatch is the free and open source automated time tracker in the productivity and time tracking ecosystem. It is written in Python and uses the MPL 2.0 license. The project records what a user does so the user can know how time has been spent, while keeping the data under the user's control.

read the full ActivityWatch overview →

About Freeter

Freeter is a free, open source desktop workspace organizer, licensed under GPL 3.0 and written in TypeScript, for people who work on their computer and need to gather everything required for a project into one place.

read the full Freeter overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

super-productivity vs activitywatch activitywatch vs solidtime super-productivity vs solidtime super-productivity vs kimai super-productivity vs ueli super-productivity vs wakapi super-productivity vs sol super-productivity vs kanri n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Time & Task Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Time & Task Management field.

ActivityWatch vs Super Productivity ActivityWatch vs SolidTime ActivityWatch vs Kimai ActivityWatch vs Ueli ActivityWatch vs Wakapi ActivityWatch vs Sol ActivityWatch vs Kanri ActivityWatch vs TimeScribe ActivityWatch vs Ever Teams ActivityWatch vs Ziit ActivityWatch vs Hackatime

Frequently asked questions

Is ActivityWatch or Freeter more popular?

ActivityWatch has 18,919 GitHub stars and Freeter has 1,026. ActivityWatch has the larger community by that measure.

Are ActivityWatch and Freeter free?

Both are open source. ActivityWatch is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Freeter under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ActivityWatch and Freeter?

ActivityWatch is written in Python and Freeter in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ActivityWatch or Freeter?

Choose ActivityWatch if you want the larger community (18,919 stars) or its MPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose Freeter if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.