head to head · open source

Super Productivity vs ActivityWatch

Super Productivity has 23,356 GitHub stars, 2,246 forks, 1,480 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ActivityWatch has 19,481 stars, 1,068 forks, 186 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Super Productivity leads on adoption by 20% (23,356 vs 19,481 stars). Super Productivity is written in TypeScript under MIT; ActivityWatch is written in Python under MPL-2.0. Super Productivity has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, ActivityWatch 5%. Super Productivity was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Super Productivity ★ 23K ActivityWatch ★ 19K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Super Productivity ActivityWatch
GitHub stars ★ 23K ★ 19K
License MIT MPL-2.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-01
Forks ⑂ 2.2K ⑂ 1.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Super Productivity if

  • You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Super Productivity profile →

pick ActivityWatch if

  • You want the ActivityWatch feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and ActivityWatch fits your workflow better

full ActivityWatch profile →

About Super Productivity

An advanced todo list app with timeboxing & time tracking capabilities that supports importing tasks from your calendar, Jira, GitHub and others :globe with meridians: Open Web App or :computer: Download :computer: Downloads & Install For all current downloads, package links, and platform specific notes: check the wiki Humanitarian Aid for Ukraine Support humanitarian relief via the official National Bank of Ukraine account. :heavy check mark: Features Keep organized and focused! Plan and categorize your tasks using sub tasks, projects and tags and color code them as needed. Use timeboxing and track your time…

read the full Super Productivity overview →

About ActivityWatch

Records what you do so that you can know how you've spent your time . All in a secure way where you control the data . Website — Forum — Documentation — Releases Contributor stats — CI overview Do you want to receive email updates on major announcements? Signup for the newsletter! Table of Contents About Screenshots Is this yet another time tracker? Feature comparison Installation & Usage About this repository Server Watchers Libraries Contributing About The goal of ActivityWatch is simple: Enable the collection of as much valuable lifedata as possible without compromising user privacy. We've worked towards this…

read the full ActivityWatch overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

Related comparisons

More Time & Task Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Time & Task Management field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Super Productivity or ActivityWatch more popular?

Super Productivity has 23,356 GitHub stars and ActivityWatch has 19,481. Super Productivity has the larger community by that measure.

Are Super Productivity and ActivityWatch free?

Both are open source. Super Productivity is licensed under MIT and ActivityWatch under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Super Productivity and ActivityWatch?

Super Productivity is written in TypeScript and ActivityWatch in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Super Productivity or ActivityWatch?

Choose Super Productivity if you want the larger community (23,356 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ActivityWatch if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.