head to head · open source
ActivityWatch vs Ever Teams
ActivityWatch has 19,481 GitHub stars, 1,068 forks, 186 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Ever Teams has 602 stars, 114 forks, 246 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. ActivityWatch leads on adoption by 3,136% (19,481 vs 602 stars). ActivityWatch is written in Python under MPL-2.0; Ever Teams is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. ActivityWatch has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Ever Teams 19%. ActivityWatch was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (productivity, time-tracker, time-tracking), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ActivityWatch | Ever Teams | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 19K | ★ 602 |
| License | MPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-01 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.1K | ⑂ 114 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ActivityWatch if
- You weight community size — 19K stars and counting
- You want the MPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Ever Teams if
- You want the Ever Teams feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Ever Teams fits your workflow better
About ActivityWatch
Records what you do so that you can know how you've spent your time . All in a secure way where you control the data . Website — Forum — Documentation — Releases Contributor stats — CI overview Do you want to receive email updates on major announcements? Signup for the newsletter! Table of Contents About Screenshots Is this yet another time tracker? Feature comparison Installation & Usage About this repository Server Watchers Libraries Contributing About The goal of ActivityWatch is simple: Enable the collection of as much valuable lifedata as possible without compromising user privacy. We've worked towards this…
read the full ActivityWatch overview →
About Ever Teams
Ever Teams Platform [uri gauzy]: [uri license]: [uri license image]: [![License: AGPL v3][uri license image]][uri license] 💡 What's New 🔥🔥🔥 we just released Ever Works An open agentic runtime that autonomously researches, ships, and maintains entire businesses, 24/7. Please grab it now from and make it ⭐⭐⭐ on GitHub! if you like Ever Teams, you should also check Ever Gauzy Open Business Management Platform (ERP/CRM/HRM/ATS/PM). Please check and make it ⭐ on GitHub! Ever Teams actually utilize Ever Gauzy headless APIs, see Ever Gauzy Platform APIs. ⭐️ What is it? Ever® Teams™ Open Work and Project Management…
read the full Ever Teams overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Time & Task Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Time & Task Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ActivityWatch or Ever Teams more popular?
ActivityWatch has 19,481 GitHub stars and Ever Teams has 602. ActivityWatch has the larger community by that measure.
Are ActivityWatch and Ever Teams free?
Both are open source. ActivityWatch is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Ever Teams under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between ActivityWatch and Ever Teams?
ActivityWatch is written in Python and Ever Teams in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ActivityWatch or Ever Teams?
Choose ActivityWatch if you want the larger community (19,481 stars) or its MPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose Ever Teams if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.