head to head · open source

NocoDB vs Activeloop

NocoDB has 65,016 GitHub stars, 5,058 forks, 710 open issues and last shipped today. Activeloop has 9,241 stars, 722 forks, 66 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. NocoDB leads on adoption by 604% (65,016 vs 9,241 stars). NocoDB is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Activeloop is written in C++ under Apache-2.0. NocoDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Activeloop 8%. NocoDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoDB ★ 65K Activeloop ★ 9.2K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoDB Activeloop
GitHub stars ★ 65K ★ 9.2K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript C++
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-05-21
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 722
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoDB if

  • You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoDB profile →

pick Activeloop if

  • You want the Activeloop feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and Activeloop fits your workflow better

full Activeloop profile →

About NocoDB

NocoDB is a free and self hostable open source Airtable alternative that turns an existing relational database into an intuitive spreadsheet interface, built for teams who want no code data management without moving their data into a hosted SaaS product.

read the full NocoDB overview →

About Activeloop

Activeloop Deep Lake is an open source database for AI data, written in C++ under Apache 2.0. It presents itself as a tensor database and AI data runtime for agents, combining serverless Postgres with a multimodal datalake for scalable retrieval and training. The project lives in the machine learning infrastructure ecosystem.

read the full Activeloop overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

supabase vs nocodb mall vs nocodb prometheus vs nocodb mall vs prometheus supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

NocoDB vs mall NocoDB vs Prometheus NocoDB vs etcd NocoDB vs DBeaver NocoDB vs orm NocoDB vs Milvus NocoDB vs TiDB NocoDB vs drawDB NocoDB vs typeorm NocoDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager NocoDB vs Qdrant NocoDB vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoDB or Activeloop more popular?

NocoDB has 65,016 GitHub stars and Activeloop has 9,241. NocoDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoDB and Activeloop free?

Both are open source. NocoDB has no licence declared in this registry, and Activeloop is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoDB and Activeloop?

NocoDB is written in TypeScript and Activeloop in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoDB or Activeloop?

Choose NocoDB if you want the larger community (65,016 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Activeloop if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.