head to head · open source

zipkin vs langsmith-sdk

zipkin has 17,464 GitHub stars, 3,098 forks, 175 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. langsmith-sdk has 1,060 stars, 298 forks, 216 open issues and last shipped yesterday. zipkin leads on adoption by 1,548% (17,464 vs 1,060 stars). zipkin is written in Java under Apache-2.0; langsmith-sdk is written in Python under MIT. zipkin has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, langsmith-sdk 28%. langsmith-sdk was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (observability), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

zipkin ★ 17K langsmith-sdk ★ 1.1K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

zipkin langsmith-sdk
GitHub stars ★ 17K ★ 1.1K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Java Python
Last push 2026-08-06 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 3.1K ⑂ 298
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick zipkin if

  • You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full zipkin profile →

pick langsmith-sdk if

  • You want the langsmith-sdk feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and langsmith-sdk fits your workflow better

full langsmith-sdk profile →

About zipkin

Zipkin is a distributed tracing system maintained under the OpenZipkin organization and written in Java, released under the Apache 2.0 license. It lives in the Java and JVM ecosystem as a standalone server, while its instrumentation libraries span many languages. The project gathers the timing data needed to troubleshoot latency problems in service architectures, and it covers both the collection and the lookup of that data.

read the full zipkin overview →

About langsmith-sdk

LangSmith SDK is the official pair of Python and JavaScript client libraries for the LangSmith platform, built and maintained by LangChain for teams that need to debug, evaluate, and monitor language models and intelligent agents.

read the full langsmith-sdk overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

zipkin vs Uptime Kuma zipkin vs worldmonitor zipkin vs NetData zipkin vs Grafana zipkin vs huginn zipkin vs Sentry zipkin vs SigNoz zipkin vs Grafana Loki zipkin vs beszel zipkin vs cilium zipkin vs Apache SkyWalking zipkin vs jaeger

Frequently asked questions

Is zipkin or langsmith-sdk more popular?

zipkin has 17,464 GitHub stars and langsmith-sdk has 1,060. zipkin has the larger community by that measure.

Are zipkin and langsmith-sdk free?

Both are open source. zipkin is licensed under Apache-2.0 and langsmith-sdk under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between zipkin and langsmith-sdk?

zipkin is written in Java and langsmith-sdk in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, zipkin or langsmith-sdk?

Choose zipkin if you want the larger community (17,464 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose langsmith-sdk if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.