head to head · open source

zipkin vs future-agi

zipkin has 17,464 GitHub stars, 3,098 forks, 175 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. future-agi has 2,041 stars, 631 forks, 889 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. zipkin leads on adoption by 756% (17,464 vs 2,041 stars). zipkin is written in Java under Apache-2.0; future-agi is written in Python under Apache-2.0. zipkin has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, future-agi 31%. future-agi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

zipkin ★ 17K future-agi ★ 2.0K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

zipkin future-agi
GitHub stars ★ 17K ★ 2.0K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java Python
Last push 2026-08-06 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 3.1K ⑂ 631
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick zipkin if

  • You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full zipkin profile →

pick future-agi if

  • You want the future-agi feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and future-agi fits your workflow better

full future-agi profile →

About zipkin

Zipkin is a distributed tracing system maintained under the OpenZipkin organization and written in Java, released under the Apache 2.0 license. It lives in the Java and JVM ecosystem as a standalone server, while its instrumentation libraries span many languages. The project gathers the timing data needed to troubleshoot latency problems in service architectures, and it covers both the collection and the lookup of that data.

read the full zipkin overview →

About future-agi

Future AGI is an open source platform for evaluating, observing, and improving large language model and AI agent applications. It lives in the LLM operations ecosystem, where teams need tracing, evaluations, simulations, datasets, gateway routing, guardrails, and optimization in one Apache 2.0 project.

read the full future-agi overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

zipkin vs Uptime Kuma zipkin vs worldmonitor zipkin vs NetData zipkin vs Grafana zipkin vs huginn zipkin vs Sentry zipkin vs SigNoz zipkin vs Grafana Loki zipkin vs beszel zipkin vs cilium zipkin vs Apache SkyWalking zipkin vs jaeger

Frequently asked questions

Is zipkin or future-agi more popular?

zipkin has 17,464 GitHub stars and future-agi has 2,041. zipkin has the larger community by that measure.

Are zipkin and future-agi free?

Both are open source. zipkin is licensed under Apache-2.0 and future-agi under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between zipkin and future-agi?

zipkin is written in Java and future-agi in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, zipkin or future-agi?

Choose zipkin if you want the larger community (17,464 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose future-agi if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.