head to head · open source

Tuta vs Zen

Tuta has 7,925 GitHub stars, 639 forks, 1,001 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Zen has 4,225 stars, 143 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Tuta leads on adoption by 88% (7,925 vs 4,225 stars). Tuta is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0; Zen is written in Go under MIT. Tuta has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Zen 3%. Tuta was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (privacy), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Tuta ★ 7.9K Zen ★ 4.2K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Tuta Zen
GitHub stars ★ 7.9K ★ 4.2K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 639 ⑂ 143
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Tuta if

  • You weight community size — 7.9K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Tuta profile →

pick Zen if

  • You want the Zen feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Zen fits your workflow better

full Zen profile →

About Tuta

Tuta is an open source, end to end encrypted email, calendar and contacts service for individuals and teams who need private communication to work across every device they own.

read the full Tuta overview →

About Zen

Zen is an open source desktop application written in Go for Windows, macOS, and Linux under the MIT license. It operates as a system wide ad blocker and privacy guard, so it applies to traffic from applications on the machine rather than only to browser tabs. It lives in the desktop security and privacy ecosystem, where users want filtering without browser extensions.

read the full Zen overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Tuta vs Puter Tuta vs Mattermost Tuta vs Signal Tuta vs Ente Tuta vs Element Tuta vs Fluxer Tuta vs certificates Tuta vs Cinny Tuta vs Certipy Tuta vs Stoat Tuta vs Quiet Tuta vs Wire

Frequently asked questions

Is Tuta or Zen more popular?

Tuta has 7,925 GitHub stars and Zen has 4,225. Tuta has the larger community by that measure.

Are Tuta and Zen free?

Both are open source. Tuta is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Zen under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Tuta and Zen?

Tuta is written in TypeScript and Zen in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Tuta or Zen?

Choose Tuta if you want the larger community (7,925 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Zen if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.