head to head · open source

Fluxer vs Tuta

Fluxer has 10,318 GitHub stars, 760 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped today. Tuta has 7,925 stars, 639 forks, 1,001 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Fluxer leads on adoption by 30% (10,318 vs 7,925 stars). Fluxer is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Tuta is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. Fluxer has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Tuta 8%. Fluxer was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Fluxer ★ 10K Tuta ★ 7.9K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Fluxer Tuta
GitHub stars ★ 10K ★ 7.9K
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 760 ⑂ 639
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Fluxer if

  • You weight community size — 10K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Fluxer profile →

pick Tuta if

  • You want the Tuta feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Tuta fits your workflow better

full Tuta profile →

About Fluxer

Fluxer is a free and open source instant messaging and VoIP chat application built for friends, groups, and communities. The project's tagline describes it as messaging with privacy and community focus, and the GitHub description repeats the same core purpose. The repository is written in TypeScript and is distributed under the AGPL 3.0 license.

read the full Fluxer overview →

About Tuta

Tuta is an open source, end to end encrypted email, calendar and contacts service for individuals and teams who need private communication to work across every device they own.

read the full Tuta overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Fluxer vs Puter Fluxer vs Mattermost Fluxer vs Signal Fluxer vs Ente Fluxer vs Element Fluxer vs certificates Fluxer vs Zen Fluxer vs Cinny Fluxer vs Certipy Fluxer vs Stoat Fluxer vs Quiet Fluxer vs Wire

Frequently asked questions

Is Fluxer or Tuta more popular?

Fluxer has 10,318 GitHub stars and Tuta has 7,925. Fluxer has the larger community by that measure.

Are Fluxer and Tuta free?

Both are open source. Fluxer is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Tuta under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Fluxer and Tuta?

Fluxer is written in TypeScript and Tuta in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Fluxer or Tuta?

Choose Fluxer if you want the larger community (10,318 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Tuta if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.