head to head · open source

Tuta vs Cinny

Tuta has 7,925 GitHub stars, 639 forks, 1,001 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Cinny has 3,897 stars, 578 forks, 354 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Tuta leads on adoption by 103% (7,925 vs 3,897 stars). Tuta is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0; Cinny is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Tuta has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Cinny 15%. Tuta was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Tuta ★ 7.9K Cinny ★ 3.9K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Tuta Cinny
GitHub stars ★ 7.9K ★ 3.9K
License GPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 639 ⑂ 578
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Tuta if

  • You weight community size — 7.9K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Tuta profile →

pick Cinny if

  • You want the Cinny feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Cinny fits your workflow better

full Cinny profile →

About Tuta

Tuta is an open source, end to end encrypted email, calendar and contacts service for individuals and teams who need private communication to work across every device they own.

read the full Tuta overview →

About Cinny

Cinny is an open source Matrix client written in TypeScript under AGPL 3.0. It lives in the Matrix ecosystem and is presented as "yet another matrix client," focusing on a simple, elegant, and secure interface. Its stated goal is an instant messaging application that is easy for people and has a modern touch.

read the full Cinny overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Tuta vs Puter Tuta vs Mattermost Tuta vs Signal Tuta vs Ente Tuta vs Element Tuta vs Fluxer Tuta vs certificates Tuta vs Zen Tuta vs Certipy Tuta vs Stoat Tuta vs Quiet Tuta vs Wire

Frequently asked questions

Is Tuta or Cinny more popular?

Tuta has 7,925 GitHub stars and Cinny has 3,897. Tuta has the larger community by that measure.

Are Tuta and Cinny free?

Both are open source. Tuta is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Cinny under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Tuta and Cinny?

Tuta is written in TypeScript and Cinny in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Tuta or Cinny?

Choose Tuta if you want the larger community (7,925 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Cinny if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.