head to head · open source

yazi vs xplorer

yazi has 42,367 GitHub stars, 1,023 forks, 65 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. xplorer has 5,674 stars, 379 forks, 49 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. yazi leads on adoption by 647% (42,367 vs 5,674 stars). yazi is written in Rust under MIT; xplorer is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. yazi has attracted 2% as many forks as stars, xplorer 7%. yazi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (cross-platform, file-manager), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

yazi ★ 42K xplorer ★ 5.7K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

yazi xplorer
GitHub stars ★ 42K ★ 5.7K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in Rust TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-21 2026-06-25
Forks ⑂ 1.0K ⑂ 379
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick yazi if

  • You weight community size — 42K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full yazi profile →

pick xplorer if

  • You want the xplorer feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and xplorer fits your workflow better

full xplorer profile →

About yazi

Yazi is a terminal file manager written in Rust on non blocking async I/O, aimed at developers and command line users who want fast, customizable file browsing without leaving the terminal.

read the full yazi overview →

About xplorer

Xplorer is a cross platform, AI integrated desktop file manager built as a Tauri 2 application with a Rust backend and a React frontend, aimed at developers, researchers, students, and power users who want more from their files than the manager their operating system ships with.

read the full xplorer overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs yazi localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

yazi vs LocalSend yazi vs rclone yazi vs copyparty yazi vs Files yazi vs Spacedrive yazi vs Nextcloud yazi vs uppy yazi vs cloudreve yazi vs superfile yazi vs ranger yazi vs Seafile yazi vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is yazi or xplorer more popular?

yazi has 42,367 GitHub stars and xplorer has 5,674. yazi has the larger community by that measure.

Are yazi and xplorer free?

Both are open source. yazi is licensed under MIT and xplorer under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between yazi and xplorer?

yazi is written in Rust and xplorer in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, yazi or xplorer?

Choose yazi if you want the larger community (42,367 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose xplorer if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.