head to head · open source

yazi vs walk

yazi has 42,463 GitHub stars, 1,029 forks, 65 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. walk has 3,641 stars, 107 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 9 months ago. yazi leads on adoption by 1,066% (42,463 vs 3,641 stars). yazi is written in Rust under MIT; walk is written in Go under MIT. yazi has attracted 2% as many forks as stars, walk 3%. yazi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (cli, file-manager), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

yazi ★ 42K walk ★ 3.6K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

yazi walk
GitHub stars ★ 42K ★ 3.6K
License MIT MIT
Written in Rust Go
Last push 2026-09-21 2026-01-06
Forks ⑂ 1.0K ⑂ 107
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick yazi if

  • You weight community size — 42K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full yazi profile →

pick walk if

  • You want the walk feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and walk fits your workflow better

full walk profile →

About yazi

Yazi is a terminal file manager written in Rust on non blocking async I/O, aimed at developers and command line users who want fast, customizable file browsing without leaving the terminal.

read the full yazi overview →

About walk

Walk is an MIT licensed terminal file manager written in Go that replaces the familiar pairing of cd and ls with an interactive navigator, aimed at developers and other command line users who want to move through the filesystem with arrow keys or hjkl instead of typing paths.

read the full walk overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 125K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs yazi localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

yazi vs LocalSend yazi vs rclone yazi vs copyparty yazi vs Files yazi vs Spacedrive yazi vs Nextcloud yazi vs uppy yazi vs cloudreve yazi vs superfile yazi vs ranger yazi vs Seafile yazi vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is yazi or walk more popular?

yazi has 42,463 GitHub stars and walk has 3,641. yazi has the larger community by that measure.

Are yazi and walk free?

Both are open source. yazi is licensed under MIT and walk under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between yazi and walk?

yazi is written in Rust and walk in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, yazi or walk?

Choose yazi if you want the larger community (42,463 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose walk if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.