head to head · open source

yazi vs Hoodik

yazi has 42,303 GitHub stars, 1,023 forks, 65 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Hoodik has 1,479 stars, 68 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 22 days ago. yazi leads on adoption by 2,760% (42,303 vs 1,479 stars). yazi is written in Rust under MIT; Hoodik is written in Rust under a custom or non-standard licence. yazi has attracted 2% as many forks as stars, Hoodik 5%. yazi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

yazi ★ 42K Hoodik ★ 1.5K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

yazi Hoodik
GitHub stars ★ 42K ★ 1.5K
License MIT Custom / other
Written in Rust Rust
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-08-29
Forks ⑂ 1.0K ⑂ 68
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick yazi if

  • You weight community size — 42K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full yazi profile →

pick Hoodik if

  • You want the Hoodik feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Hoodik fits your workflow better

full Hoodik profile →

About yazi

Yazi is a terminal file manager written in Rust on non blocking async I/O, aimed at developers and command line users who want fast, customizable file browsing without leaving the terminal.

read the full yazi overview →

About Hoodik

Hoodik is a self hosted, end to end encrypted cloud storage server. It lives in the Rust and Vue ecosystem, using Actix web on the backend and Vue 3 on the frontend, and it is packaged as a Docker first service with SQLite or PostgreSQL and S3 compatible storage options.

read the full Hoodik overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs yazi localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

yazi vs LocalSend yazi vs rclone yazi vs copyparty yazi vs Files yazi vs Spacedrive yazi vs Nextcloud yazi vs uppy yazi vs cloudreve yazi vs superfile yazi vs ranger yazi vs Seafile yazi vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is yazi or Hoodik more popular?

yazi has 42,303 GitHub stars and Hoodik has 1,479. yazi has the larger community by that measure.

Are yazi and Hoodik free?

Both are open source. yazi is licensed under MIT, and Hoodik has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between yazi and Hoodik?

yazi is written in Rust and Hoodik in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, yazi or Hoodik?

Choose yazi if you want the larger community (42,303 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Hoodik if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.