head to head · open source

xxl-job vs workflow

xxl-job has 30,562 GitHub stars, 11,486 forks, 79 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. workflow has 2,416 stars, 361 forks, 360 open issues and last shipped yesterday. xxl-job leads on adoption by 1,165% (30,562 vs 2,416 stars). xxl-job is written in Java under GPL-3.0; workflow is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. xxl-job has attracted 38% as many forks as stars, workflow 15%. workflow was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

xxl-job ★ 31K workflow ★ 2.4K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

xxl-job workflow
GitHub stars ★ 31K ★ 2.4K
License GPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java TypeScript
Last push 2026-07-21 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 11K ⑂ 361
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick xxl-job if

  • You weight community size — 31K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full xxl-job profile →

pick workflow if

  • You want the workflow feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and workflow fits your workflow better

full workflow profile →

About xxl-job

XXL JOB is a distributed task scheduling framework written in Java and released under the GPL 3.0 licence, built for teams that need scheduled jobs to run reliably across a cluster of machines rather than inside a single application process.

read the full xxl-job overview →

About workflow

Workflow SDK is a TypeScript and JavaScript library that makes application functions durable. It lives in the TypeScript/JavaScript ecosystem and targets server side frameworks such as Next.js. The project is intended for apps and AI agents that need to continue work across failures, waits, and restarts.

read the full workflow overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs xxl-job conductor vs xxl-job compose vs conductor compose vs gitleaks compose vs kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs prefect uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

xxl-job vs compose xxl-job vs conductor xxl-job vs gitleaks xxl-job vs Kestra xxl-job vs haystack xxl-job vs rancher xxl-job vs Prefect xxl-job vs Archon xxl-job vs Temporal xxl-job vs rowboat xxl-job vs Trigger xxl-job vs dolphinscheduler

Frequently asked questions

Is xxl-job or workflow more popular?

xxl-job has 30,562 GitHub stars and workflow has 2,416. xxl-job has the larger community by that measure.

Are xxl-job and workflow free?

Both are open source. xxl-job is licensed under GPL-3.0 and workflow under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between xxl-job and workflow?

xxl-job is written in Java and workflow in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, xxl-job or workflow?

Choose xxl-job if you want the larger community (30,562 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose workflow if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.