head to head · open source

xxl-job vs Mage

xxl-job has 30,562 GitHub stars, 11,486 forks, 79 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Mage has 8,823 stars, 990 forks, 624 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. xxl-job leads on adoption by 246% (30,562 vs 8,823 stars). xxl-job is written in Java under GPL-3.0; Mage is written in Python under Apache-2.0. xxl-job has attracted 38% as many forks as stars, Mage 11%. Mage was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

xxl-job ★ 31K Mage ★ 8.8K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

xxl-job Mage
GitHub stars ★ 31K ★ 8.8K
License GPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java Python
Last push 2026-07-21 2026-09-11
Forks ⑂ 11K ⑂ 990
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick xxl-job if

  • You weight community size — 31K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full xxl-job profile →

pick Mage if

  • You want the Mage feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Mage fits your workflow better

full Mage profile →

About xxl-job

XXL JOB is a distributed task scheduling framework written in Java and released under the GPL 3.0 licence, built for teams that need scheduled jobs to run reliably across a cluster of machines rather than inside a single application process.

read the full xxl-job overview →

About Mage

Mage is an Apache 2.0 licensed, self hosted development environment for building, running, and managing data pipelines, aimed at data engineers, data scientists, and analytics teams who want to develop ETL, ELT, and orchestration workflows locally before scaling them.

read the full Mage overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs xxl-job conductor vs xxl-job compose vs conductor compose vs gitleaks compose vs kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs prefect uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

xxl-job vs compose xxl-job vs conductor xxl-job vs gitleaks xxl-job vs Kestra xxl-job vs haystack xxl-job vs rancher xxl-job vs Prefect xxl-job vs Archon xxl-job vs Temporal xxl-job vs rowboat xxl-job vs Trigger xxl-job vs dolphinscheduler

Frequently asked questions

Is xxl-job or Mage more popular?

xxl-job has 30,562 GitHub stars and Mage has 8,823. xxl-job has the larger community by that measure.

Are xxl-job and Mage free?

Both are open source. xxl-job is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Mage under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between xxl-job and Mage?

xxl-job is written in Java and Mage in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, xxl-job or Mage?

Choose xxl-job if you want the larger community (30,562 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Mage if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.