head to head · open source

xxl-job vs livecontext-ce

xxl-job has 30,566 GitHub stars, 11,490 forks, 79 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. livecontext-ce has 502 stars, 59 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 12 days ago. xxl-job leads on adoption by 5,989% (30,566 vs 502 stars). xxl-job is written in Java under GPL-3.0; livecontext-ce is written in Java under AGPL-3.0. xxl-job has attracted 38% as many forks as stars, livecontext-ce 12%. livecontext-ce was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

xxl-job ★ 31K livecontext-ce ★ 502 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

xxl-job livecontext-ce
GitHub stars ★ 31K ★ 502
License GPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Java Java
Last push 2026-07-21 2026-09-08
Forks ⑂ 11K ⑂ 59
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick xxl-job if

  • You weight community size — 31K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full xxl-job profile →

pick livecontext-ce if

  • You want the livecontext-ce feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and livecontext-ce fits your workflow better

full livecontext-ce profile →

About xxl-job

XXL JOB is a distributed task scheduling framework written in Java and released under the GPL 3.0 licence, built for teams that need scheduled jobs to run reliably across a cluster of machines rather than inside a single application process.

read the full xxl-job overview →

About livecontext-ce

LiveContext CE is the self hosted, AGPL 3.0 Community Edition of the LiveContext AI automation platform, a single Docker deployed service where a team describes a job in chat and gets back a readable workflow, scoped AI agents and a small app the team actually uses.

read the full livecontext-ce overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

ansible vs xxl-job n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

xxl-job vs ansible xxl-job vs compose xxl-job vs conductor xxl-job vs gitleaks xxl-job vs Kestra xxl-job vs haystack xxl-job vs rancher xxl-job vs Prefect xxl-job vs Archon xxl-job vs Temporal xxl-job vs rowboat xxl-job vs Trigger

Frequently asked questions

Is xxl-job or livecontext-ce more popular?

xxl-job has 30,566 GitHub stars and livecontext-ce has 502. xxl-job has the larger community by that measure.

Are xxl-job and livecontext-ce free?

Both are open source. xxl-job is licensed under GPL-3.0 and livecontext-ce under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between xxl-job and livecontext-ce?

xxl-job is written in Java and livecontext-ce in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, xxl-job or livecontext-ce?

Choose xxl-job if you want the larger community (30,566 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose livecontext-ce if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.