head to head · open source

xxl-job vs Hatchet

xxl-job has 30,562 GitHub stars, 11,486 forks, 79 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Hatchet has 7,957 stars, 504 forks, 135 open issues and last shipped yesterday. xxl-job leads on adoption by 284% (30,562 vs 7,957 stars). xxl-job is written in Java under GPL-3.0; Hatchet is written in Go under MIT. xxl-job has attracted 38% as many forks as stars, Hatchet 6%. Hatchet was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (distributed), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

xxl-job ★ 31K Hatchet ★ 8.0K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

xxl-job Hatchet
GitHub stars ★ 31K ★ 8.0K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Java Go
Last push 2026-07-21 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 11K ⑂ 504
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick xxl-job if

  • You weight community size — 31K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full xxl-job profile →

pick Hatchet if

  • You want the Hatchet feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Hatchet fits your workflow better

full Hatchet profile →

About xxl-job

XXL JOB is a distributed task scheduling framework written in Java and released under the GPL 3.0 licence, built for teams that need scheduled jobs to run reliably across a cluster of machines rather than inside a single application process.

read the full xxl-job overview →

About Hatchet

Hatchet is an MIT licensed, Go based orchestration engine for background tasks, AI agents, and durable workflows, built for teams that need reliable queueing, retries, and observability while writing workers in Python, TypeScript, Go, or Ruby.

read the full Hatchet overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs xxl-job conductor vs xxl-job compose vs conductor compose vs gitleaks compose vs kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs prefect uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

xxl-job vs compose xxl-job vs conductor xxl-job vs gitleaks xxl-job vs Kestra xxl-job vs haystack xxl-job vs rancher xxl-job vs Prefect xxl-job vs Archon xxl-job vs Temporal xxl-job vs rowboat xxl-job vs Trigger xxl-job vs dolphinscheduler

Frequently asked questions

Is xxl-job or Hatchet more popular?

xxl-job has 30,562 GitHub stars and Hatchet has 7,957. xxl-job has the larger community by that measure.

Are xxl-job and Hatchet free?

Both are open source. xxl-job is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Hatchet under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between xxl-job and Hatchet?

xxl-job is written in Java and Hatchet in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, xxl-job or Hatchet?

Choose xxl-job if you want the larger community (30,562 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Hatchet if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.