head to head · open source
xxl-job vs agent-orchestrator
xxl-job has 30,562 GitHub stars, 11,486 forks, 79 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. agent-orchestrator has 12,140 stars, 1,671 forks, 711 open issues and last shipped yesterday. xxl-job leads on adoption by 152% (30,562 vs 12,140 stars). xxl-job is written in Java under GPL-3.0; agent-orchestrator is written in Go under Apache-2.0. xxl-job has attracted 38% as many forks as stars, agent-orchestrator 14%. agent-orchestrator was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| xxl-job | agent-orchestrator | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 31K | ★ 12K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Java | Go |
| Last push | 2026-07-21 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 11K | ⑂ 1.7K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick xxl-job if
- You weight community size — 31K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick agent-orchestrator if
- You want the agent-orchestrator feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and agent-orchestrator fits your workflow better
About xxl-job
XXL JOB is a distributed task scheduling framework written in Java and released under the GPL 3.0 licence, built for teams that need scheduled jobs to run reliably across a cluster of machines rather than inside a single application process.
read the full xxl-job overview →
About agent-orchestrator
Agent Orchestrator is an open source desktop workspace for running and supervising teams of coding agents, written in Go and released under the Apache 2.0 license. It lives in the agent orchestration ecosystem, alongside the coding harnesses it drives, and it is distributed as a local application rather than as a hosted service. The project describes itself as a place to plan, run, and supervise coding agents from one place, giving every coding task its own agent, workspace, and feedback loop.
read the full agent-orchestrator overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is xxl-job or agent-orchestrator more popular?
xxl-job has 30,562 GitHub stars and agent-orchestrator has 12,140. xxl-job has the larger community by that measure.
Are xxl-job and agent-orchestrator free?
Both are open source. xxl-job is licensed under GPL-3.0 and agent-orchestrator under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between xxl-job and agent-orchestrator?
xxl-job is written in Java and agent-orchestrator in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, xxl-job or agent-orchestrator?
Choose xxl-job if you want the larger community (30,562 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose agent-orchestrator if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.