head to head · open source

Langflow vs rea

Langflow has 155,402 GitHub stars, 10,189 forks, 1,056 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rea has 29,472 stars, 3,500 forks, 70 open issues and last shipped today. Langflow leads on adoption by 427% (155,402 vs 29,472 stars). Langflow is written in Python under MIT; rea is written in TypeScript under MIT. Langflow has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, rea 12%. rea was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Langflow ★ 155K rea ★ 29K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Langflow rea
GitHub stars ★ 155K ★ 29K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-08 2026-10-09
Forks ⑂ 10K ⑂ 3.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Langflow if

  • You weight community size — 155K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Langflow profile →

pick rea if

  • You want the rea feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and rea fits your workflow better

full rea profile →

About Langflow

Langflow is a visual builder platform for designing, testing, and deploying AI agents and retrieval augmented generation (RAG) pipelines. It lives in the Python based generative AI ecosystem and targets developers building intelligent applications. The project provides a low code interface to assemble components—such as LLMs, vector stores, memory modules, and tools—into executable workflows, while also exposing those workflows as APIs or MCP servers for integration into external applications.

read the full Langflow overview →

About rea

REA is an open source MCP server and CLI that lets AI coding agents — and your terminal — reverse engineer native binaries, JavaScript and Electron apps, .NET assemblies, and websites, with evidence attached to every conclusion.

read the full rea overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 275K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 193K pi ★ 114K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs langflow react vs langflow n8n vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs supabase react vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Langflow vs ECC Langflow vs react Langflow vs Supabase Langflow vs puppeteer Langflow vs archify Langflow vs PocketBase Langflow vs i-have-adhd Langflow vs codebase-memory-mcp Langflow vs herdr Langflow vs ToolJet Langflow vs AppSmith Langflow vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is Langflow or rea more popular?

Langflow has 155,402 GitHub stars and rea has 29,472. Langflow has the larger community by that measure.

Are Langflow and rea free?

Both are open source. Langflow is licensed under MIT and rea under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Langflow and rea?

Langflow is written in Python and rea in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Langflow or rea?

Choose Langflow if you want the larger community (155,402 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose rea if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.