head to head · open source

PocketBase vs rea

PocketBase has 61,333 GitHub stars, 3,728 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rea has 29,472 stars, 3,500 forks, 70 open issues and last shipped today. PocketBase leads on adoption by 108% (61,333 vs 29,472 stars). PocketBase is written in Go under MIT; rea is written in TypeScript under MIT. PocketBase has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, rea 12%. rea was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

PocketBase ★ 61K rea ★ 29K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

PocketBase rea
GitHub stars ★ 61K ★ 29K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-08 2026-10-09
Forks ⑂ 3.7K ⑂ 3.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick PocketBase if

  • You weight community size — 61K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full PocketBase profile →

pick rea if

  • You want the rea feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and rea fits your workflow better

full rea profile →

About PocketBase

PocketBase is an open source backend framework written in Go that bundles a SQLite database, authentication, file storage, admin dashboard, and REST API into a single executable file. It lives in the Go ecosystem and targets developers who want a lightweight, self contained backend without managing separate services like PostgreSQL, Redis, or a separate auth server.

read the full PocketBase overview →

About rea

REA is an open source MCP server and CLI that lets AI coding agents — and your terminal — reverse engineer native binaries, JavaScript and Electron apps, .NET assemblies, and websites, with evidence attached to every conclusion.

read the full rea overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 275K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 114K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

PocketBase vs ECC PocketBase vs react PocketBase vs Langflow PocketBase vs Supabase PocketBase vs puppeteer PocketBase vs archify PocketBase vs i-have-adhd PocketBase vs codebase-memory-mcp PocketBase vs herdr PocketBase vs ToolJet PocketBase vs AppSmith PocketBase vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is PocketBase or rea more popular?

PocketBase has 61,333 GitHub stars and rea has 29,472. PocketBase has the larger community by that measure.

Are PocketBase and rea free?

Both are open source. PocketBase is licensed under MIT and rea under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between PocketBase and rea?

PocketBase is written in Go and rea in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, PocketBase or rea?

Choose PocketBase if you want the larger community (61,333 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose rea if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.