head to head · open source

gitleaks vs workflow-core

gitleaks has 29,396 GitHub stars, 2,236 forks, 481 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. workflow-core has 5,926 stars, 1,262 forks, 133 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. gitleaks leads on adoption by 396% (29,396 vs 5,926 stars). gitleaks is written in Go under MIT; workflow-core is written in C# under MIT. gitleaks has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, workflow-core 21%. workflow-core was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (hacktoberfest), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

gitleaks ★ 29K workflow-core ★ 5.9K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

gitleaks workflow-core
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 5.9K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go C#
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 2.2K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick gitleaks if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full gitleaks profile →

pick workflow-core if

  • You want the workflow-core feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and workflow-core fits your workflow better

full workflow-core profile →

About gitleaks

Gitleaks is an MIT licensed, Go based command line tool that detects hardcoded secrets such as passwords, API keys, and tokens in git repositories, files, and standard input, and it serves developers and security teams that need to keep credentials out of source control.

read the full gitleaks overview →

About workflow-core

Workflow Core is a lightweight, embeddable workflow engine targeting .NET Standard, written in C and released under the MIT license. It lives in the .NET ecosystem, distributed as NuGet packages, and is built around the idea of long running processes that contain multiple tasks and must track their state between steps. Rather than running as a separate server, it is a library that is hosted inside an application, and it exposes a fluent C API for defining workflows. Workflows are expressed as a starting step followed by chained steps, and the same class can declare inputs and outputs that move data from one step …

read the full workflow-core overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

ansible vs gitleaks n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs kestra n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

gitleaks vs ansible gitleaks vs compose gitleaks vs conductor gitleaks vs xxl-job gitleaks vs Kestra gitleaks vs haystack gitleaks vs rancher gitleaks vs Prefect gitleaks vs Archon gitleaks vs Temporal gitleaks vs rowboat gitleaks vs Trigger

Frequently asked questions

Is gitleaks or workflow-core more popular?

gitleaks has 29,396 GitHub stars and workflow-core has 5,926. gitleaks has the larger community by that measure.

Are gitleaks and workflow-core free?

Both are open source. gitleaks is licensed under MIT and workflow-core under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between gitleaks and workflow-core?

gitleaks is written in Go and workflow-core in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, gitleaks or workflow-core?

Choose gitleaks if you want the larger community (29,396 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose workflow-core if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.