head to head · open source
Wallabag vs Cloudmark
Wallabag has 12,969 GitHub stars, 896 forks, 764 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Cloudmark has 74 stars, 9 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Wallabag leads on adoption by 17,426% (12,969 vs 74 stars). Wallabag is written in PHP under MIT; Cloudmark is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Wallabag has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Cloudmark 12%. Wallabag was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Wallabag | Cloudmark | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 13K | ★ 74 |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | PHP | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-14 | 2026-08-10 |
| Forks | ⑂ 896 | ⑂ 9 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Wallabag if
- You weight community size — 13K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches PHP
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Cloudmark if
- You want the Cloudmark feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Cloudmark fits your workflow better
About Wallabag
wallabag is a self hosted web application for saving web pages and reading them later. It lives in the PHP and Symfony ecosystem, is released under the MIT license, and presents itself as a read it later tool for users who want to keep their saved articles on their own server. The project also points to wallabag.it as a hosted account option for people who do not want to run the application themselves.
read the full Wallabag overview →
About Cloudmark
Cloudmark is a universal bookmark management tool built for the cloud, written in TypeScript and released under the AGPL 3.0 license. It runs on the Cloudflare ecosystem, pairing a Cloudflare Worker for application logic with Cloudflare D1 as relational storage at the edge. A bookmarklet and a Manifest V3 Chrome extension act as the capture surfaces, while a web interface at cloudmark.site serves as the place to browse, filter, and edit saved pages. The project stores bookmarks under a user chosen collection identifier called a mark .
read the full Cloudmark overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Bookmark & Content Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Bookmark & Content Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Wallabag or Cloudmark more popular?
Wallabag has 12,969 GitHub stars and Cloudmark has 74. Wallabag has the larger community by that measure.
Are Wallabag and Cloudmark free?
Both are open source. Wallabag is licensed under MIT and Cloudmark under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Wallabag and Cloudmark?
Wallabag is written in PHP and Cloudmark in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Wallabag or Cloudmark?
Choose Wallabag if you want the larger community (12,969 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Cloudmark if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.