head to head · open source

vuls vs cve

vuls has 12,267 GitHub stars, 1,245 forks, 92 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cve has 8,087 stars, 977 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. vuls leads on adoption by 52% (12,267 vs 8,087 stars). vuls is written in Go under GPL-3.0; cve is written in HTML under MIT. vuls has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, cve 12%. vuls was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (security, security-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

vuls ★ 12K cve ★ 8.1K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

vuls cve
GitHub stars ★ 12K ★ 8.1K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go HTML
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-09-23
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 977
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick vuls if

  • You weight community size — 12K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full vuls profile →

pick cve if

  • You want the cve feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and cve fits your workflow better

full cve profile →

About vuls

Vuls is an agent less vulnerability scanner written in Go and licensed under GPL 3.0, aimed at system administrators and security teams that must find and track known vulnerabilities across Linux, FreeBSD, Windows and macOS hosts, containers, WordPress installs, programming language libraries and network devices without installing an agent on every machine.

read the full vuls overview →

About cve

cve is an automatically generated, MIT licensed repository from Trickest that gathers almost every publicly available CVE Proof of Concept and publishes it as browsable markdown files, made for penetration testers, red teams and vulnerability researchers who need to find public exploits for a given identifier.

read the full cve overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

vuls vs PayloadsAllTheThings vuls vs Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vuls vs ProjectDiscovery vuls vs pentagi vuls vs PentestGPT vuls vs Osintgram vuls vs thc-hydra vuls vs osv-scanner vuls vs rengine vuls vs reconftw vuls vs Nettacker vuls vs GDA-android-reversing-Tool

Frequently asked questions

Is vuls or cve more popular?

vuls has 12,267 GitHub stars and cve has 8,087. vuls has the larger community by that measure.

Are vuls and cve free?

Both are open source. vuls is licensed under GPL-3.0 and cve under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between vuls and cve?

vuls is written in Go and cve in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, vuls or cve?

Choose vuls if you want the larger community (12,267 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose cve if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.