head to head · open source
vuls vs reconftw
vuls has 12,330 GitHub stars, 1,247 forks, 92 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. reconftw has 8,338 stars, 1,263 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. vuls leads on adoption by 48% (12,330 vs 8,338 stars). vuls is written in Go under GPL-3.0; reconftw is written in Shell under MIT. vuls has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, reconftw 15%. vuls was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| vuls | reconftw | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 12K | ★ 8.3K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Shell |
| Last push | 2026-11-06 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.2K | ⑂ 1.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick vuls if
- You weight community size — 12K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick reconftw if
- You want the reconftw feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Shell
- You evaluated both and reconftw fits your workflow better
About vuls
Vuls: VULnerability Scanner Vulnerability scanner for Linux/FreeBSD, agent less, written in Go. Twitter: @vuls en Abstract For a system administrator, having to perform security vulnerability analysis and software update on a daily basis can be a burden. To avoid downtime in a production environment, it is common for a system administrator to choose not to use the automatic update option provided by the package manager and to perform update manually. This leads to the following problems. The system administrator will have to constantly watch out for any new vulnerabilities in NVD (National Vulnerability…
About reconftw
reconFTW reconFTW is a powerful automated reconnaissance tool designed for security researchers and penetration testers. It streamlines the process of gathering intelligence on a target by performing subdomain enumeration, vulnerability scanning, OSINT and more. With a modular design, extensive configuration options, and support for distributed scanning via AX Framework, reconFTW is built to deliver comprehensive results efficiently. reconFTW leverages a wide range of techniques, including passive and active subdomain discovery, web vulnerability checks (e.g., XSS, SSRF, SQLi), OSINT, directory fuzzing, port…
read the full reconftw overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is vuls or reconftw more popular?
vuls has 12,330 GitHub stars and reconftw has 8,338. vuls has the larger community by that measure.
Are vuls and reconftw free?
Both are open source. vuls is licensed under GPL-3.0 and reconftw under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between vuls and reconftw?
vuls is written in Go and reconftw in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, vuls or reconftw?
Choose vuls if you want the larger community (12,330 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose reconftw if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.