head to head · open source

vuls vs airgorah

vuls has 12,263 GitHub stars, 1,243 forks, 92 open issues and last shipped yesterday. airgorah has 3,520 stars, 594 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped yesterday. vuls leads on adoption by 248% (12,263 vs 3,520 stars). vuls is written in Go under GPL-3.0; airgorah is written in Rust under MIT. vuls has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, airgorah 17%. airgorah was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (security, security-audit), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

vuls ★ 12K airgorah ★ 3.5K category Security & Privacy

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

vuls airgorah
GitHub stars ★ 12K ★ 3.5K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 594
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick vuls if

  • You weight community size — 12K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full vuls profile →

pick airgorah if

  • You want the airgorah feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and airgorah fits your workflow better

full airgorah profile →

About vuls

Vuls is an agent less vulnerability scanner written in Go and licensed under GPL 3.0, aimed at system administrators and security teams that must find and track known vulnerabilities across Linux, FreeBSD, Windows and macOS hosts, containers, WordPress installs, programming language libraries and network devices without installing an agent on every machine.

read the full vuls overview →

About airgorah

Airgorah is a WiFi security auditing application written in Rust with a GTK4 graphical interface, built for Linux users such as penetration testers, wireless auditors and security engineers who assess networks they own or are authorised to test.

read the full airgorah overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

puter vs projectdiscovery mattermost vs projectdiscovery keycloak vs projectdiscovery tailscale vs projectdiscovery puter vs tracecat mattermost vs tracecat keycloak vs tracecat tailscale vs tracecat supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik better-auth vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

vuls vs PayloadsAllTheThings vuls vs Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vuls vs ProjectDiscovery vuls vs pentagi vuls vs osv-scanner vuls vs Nettacker vuls vs GDA-android-reversing-Tool vuls vs afrog vuls vs Tracecat vuls vs tenzir

Frequently asked questions

Is vuls or airgorah more popular?

vuls has 12,263 GitHub stars and airgorah has 3,520. vuls has the larger community by that measure.

Are vuls and airgorah free?

Both are open source. vuls is licensed under GPL-3.0 and airgorah under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between vuls and airgorah?

vuls is written in Go and airgorah in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, vuls or airgorah?

Choose vuls if you want the larger community (12,263 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose airgorah if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.