head to head · open source

typeorm vs studio

typeorm has 36,656 GitHub stars, 6,673 forks, 646 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. studio has 5,973 stars, 265 forks, 89 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. typeorm leads on adoption by 514% (36,656 vs 5,973 stars). typeorm is written in TypeScript under MIT; studio is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. typeorm has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, studio 4%. typeorm was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (mysql, postgresql, sqlite), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

typeorm ★ 37K studio ★ 6.0K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

typeorm studio
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 6.0K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-03-25
Forks ⑂ 6.7K ⑂ 265
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick typeorm if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full typeorm profile →

pick studio if

  • You want the studio feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and studio fits your workflow better

full studio profile →

About typeorm

TypeORM is an MIT licensed object relational mapper for TypeScript and JavaScript that runs on Node.js, in the browser, and across mobile and desktop platforms, and it is aimed at developers who want to model, query, and migrate SQL and NoSQL databases from one decorator driven codebase.

read the full typeorm overview →

About studio

Outerbase Studio is a lightweight, browser based GUI for managing SQL databases, built for developers and teams who want to query, edit data, and adjust schema across SQLite family engines, MySQL, and PostgreSQL without installing a traditional desktop client.

read the full studio overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

typeorm vs mall typeorm vs Prometheus typeorm vs NocoDB typeorm vs etcd typeorm vs DBeaver typeorm vs orm typeorm vs Milvus typeorm vs TiDB typeorm vs drawDB typeorm vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager typeorm vs Qdrant typeorm vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is typeorm or studio more popular?

typeorm has 36,656 GitHub stars and studio has 5,973. typeorm has the larger community by that measure.

Are typeorm and studio free?

Both are open source. typeorm is licensed under MIT and studio under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between typeorm and studio?

typeorm is written in TypeScript and studio in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, typeorm or studio?

Choose typeorm if you want the larger community (36,656 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose studio if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.