head to head · open source

typeorm vs FreeSql

typeorm has 36,656 GitHub stars, 6,673 forks, 646 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. FreeSql has 4,403 stars, 910 forks, 178 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. typeorm leads on adoption by 733% (36,656 vs 4,403 stars). typeorm is written in TypeScript under MIT; FreeSql is written in C# under MIT. typeorm has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, FreeSql 21%. typeorm was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (hacktoberfest, mysql), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

typeorm ★ 37K FreeSql ★ 4.4K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

typeorm FreeSql
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 4.4K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript C#
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-07-31
Forks ⑂ 6.7K ⑂ 910
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick typeorm if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full typeorm profile →

pick FreeSql if

  • You want the FreeSql feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and FreeSql fits your workflow better

full FreeSql profile →

About typeorm

TypeORM is an MIT licensed object relational mapper for TypeScript and JavaScript that runs on Node.js, in the browser, and across mobile and desktop platforms, and it is aimed at developers who want to model, query, and migrate SQL and NoSQL databases from one decorator driven codebase.

read the full typeorm overview →

About FreeSql

FreeSql is an MIT licensed object relational mapper for .NET, written in C and usable from C and VB.NET, which its maintainers describe as the first AOT ORM, and it is aimed at .NET teams that want a single data access layer across many relational and analytical databases, including MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server, Oracle, SQLite, Firebird, ClickHouse, DuckDB, TDengine, QuestDB, MsAccess and a group of Chinese domestic engines.

read the full FreeSql overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

typeorm vs mall typeorm vs Prometheus typeorm vs NocoDB typeorm vs etcd typeorm vs DBeaver typeorm vs orm typeorm vs Milvus typeorm vs TiDB typeorm vs drawDB typeorm vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager typeorm vs Qdrant typeorm vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is typeorm or FreeSql more popular?

typeorm has 36,656 GitHub stars and FreeSql has 4,403. typeorm has the larger community by that measure.

Are typeorm and FreeSql free?

Both are open source. typeorm is licensed under MIT and FreeSql under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between typeorm and FreeSql?

typeorm is written in TypeScript and FreeSql in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, typeorm or FreeSql?

Choose typeorm if you want the larger community (36,656 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose FreeSql if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.